Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dacia yield did not differ significantly in that plot.

Taxon: APRICOT TREEPrunus armeniacat0
Material: Daciae0
Treatment: some plote0
Outcome: yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“APRICOT TREE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–79

e0
“Dacia variety, in the some plot had nesignificanthy differences concerning yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–704

Title

RESEARCHES REGARDING CUTTING IN GREEN INFLUENCE UPON YIELD AT SOME APRICOT TREE VARIETIES CULTIVATED AT S. D. TIMISOARA

A. Ghiţă Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture 2008. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:846

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Litoral in the uncut treatment yielded 30,7 kg per tree in 2006.
Observation Mamaia yielded 40,4 kg per tree after cutting on 15 June in 2006.
Intervention effect Most varieties showed significantly different yield from control after cutting on 15 June.
Observation Mamaia, Sulina and Olimp were the most productive in 2006.
Observation Traian uncut on 25 May had relative yield of 102,5 %.
Observation Sulina cut on 15 June had relative yield of 125,6 %.
Observation Dacia uncut in the 15 June variant yielded 10,4 t/ha in 2007.
Observation Cutting on 15 June was the best cutting variant for yield.
Intervention effect Most varieties had significantly positive yield differences under 15 June cutting versus uncut.
Intervention effect Green cutting increased yield relative to uncut treatment, but effects were not spectacular.
Recommendation The authors recommend replacing dry cuttings with green cuttings.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean yields per tree, plot and hectare did not differ significantly in the combined analysis.

Taxon: coffeeCoffeat0
Outcome: bean yield per tree (YPT), bean yield per plot (YPP), bean yield per hectare (YPHA)e0

Verbatim

e0
“bean yield per tree (YPT), bean yield per plot (YPP), bean yield per hectare (YPHA) and weight of husked clean coffee (WHCC) were not statistically significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1132

t0
“coffee varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49

Title

Evaluation of the performance of coffee varieties under low moisture stressed areas of Southern Ethiopia

Tadesse Tefera Tesfaye; Tesfaye Bizuayehu; Abera Girma African Journal of Agricultural Research 2020. doi:10.5897/ajar2019.14591

Other claims from this paper (16)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee yield did not differ among plot groups.

Taxon: coffeeCoffeae0
Outcome: coffee yieldse0
Direction: no differencee0
Comparator: groupse0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no difference in equitability among groups or coffee yields.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–851

Title

Woody plant diversity and structure of shade-grown-coffee plantations in northern Chiapas, Mexico.

L Soto-Pinto; Y Romero-Alvarado; J Caballero-Nieto; et al. PubMed 2002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Coffee stands had five vegetation strata.
Observation Seventy-seven woody species were found in the coffee plots, at a mean density of 371.4 trees per hectare.
Observation Mean tree density in the coffee plots was 371.4 trees per hectare.
Observation Ninety percent of recorded woody species were native, representing 40% of the local flora.
Observation Introduced woody species in the coffee plots were mainly fruit trees and shrubs.
Association The diameter distribution of shade vegetation resembled secondary forest.
Observation Principal coordinates analysis grouped coffee plots into four classes based on Inga presence.
Observation Most coffee plots were diverse.
Association Equitability did not differ among coffee plot groups.
Observation Coffee yield averaged 835 g clean coffee per shrub.
Observation Coffee yield was approximately 1,668 kg ha-1.
Observation Shade-grown coffee may serve as a diversity refuge for woody plants and associated fauna.
Recommendation Shade-coffee growers could participate in the biodiversity-friendly coffee market.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hedge severity did not significantly affect yield per plot.

Taxon: Primocane-fruiting Blackberryt0
Treatment: “hard” hedge, removing 0.45 me0
Outcome: yield/plote0
Direction: no significant effecte0
Comparator: “soft” hedge removing 0.10 me0

Verbatim

e0
“when plots were hedged to 1-m tall lightly (“soft” hedge removing 0.10 m) on 22–27 June or more severely (“hard” hedge, removing 0.45 m) on 29 June–2 July, using shears, there was no significant effect on yield/plot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–898

t0
“Primocane-fruiting Blackberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102

Title

The Impact of Severity and Time of Tipping and Hedging on Performance of Primocane-fruiting Blackberry in a Tunnel

Bernadine C. Strik; Gil Buller HortTechnology 2012. doi:10.21273/horttech.22.3.325

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Hard tipping produced more branches than soft tipping.
Intervention effect Hard tipping produced more fruit per cane than soft tipping.
Intervention effect Early tipping produced more fruit per cane than later tipping.
Intervention effect Early hard tipping tripled fruit per cane compared with early soft tipping.
Intervention effect Hard hedging delayed fruiting by 10–14 days relative to soft hedging.
Observation Fruit harvest continued until early to mid-November.
Observation Air in the closed tunnel averaged 2–7 °F warmer than outdoors.
Observation The tunnel protected fruit from autumn rain.
Recommendation Early hard tipping or mechanical hedging was recommended as promising for economic returns.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, and leaf weight ratio did not differ significantly between open screen house and open plot plants.

Taxon: Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor: Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome: yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratioe0
Direction: no significant differencese0
Qualifier: 70% of that in the open plot without screeninge0
Comparator: open plot without screeninge0
Setting: open screen housee0

Verbatim

e0
“There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio of plants growing in the open screen house and open plot without screening (infested plots) even though irradiance incident in the open screen house was 70% of that in the open plot without screening.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1286

e1
“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23

e2
“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351

Title

Influence Of Phytolyma lata (Homoptera: Psyllidae) On Seedling Growth Of Milicia excelsa

VK Agyeman; DA Ofori; JR Cobbinah; et al. Ghana Journal of Forestry 2010. doi:10.4314/gjf.v25i1.60697

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Avocado outcrossing rate did not correlate with yield, possibly because of non-uniform rootstocks.

Taxon: AVOCADOPersea americanat0
Treatment: outcrossing ratee0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: No correlatione0
Qualifier: probably due to the non-uniformity of the rootstocks in the plote0

Verbatim

e0
“No correlation was found between outcrossing rate and yield, probably due to the non-uniformity of the rootstocks in the plot.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1558

t0
“AVOCADO”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38

Title

SELF- AND CROSS-POLLINATION IN AVOCADO

C. Degani; R. El-Batsri; M. Hamo; et al. 2003

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter treatments had no significant effect on yield, bud break or fruit per lateral the following season.

Taxon: 'MARION' BLACKBERRYt0
Treatment: winter treatmentse0
Outcome: yield per plot, percent bud break or fruit/laterale0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The winter treatments had no significant effect on yield per plot, percent bud break or fruit/lateral the following season”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1149

t0
“REDUCING THORN CONTAMINATION IN MACHINE HARVESTED 'MARION' BLACKBERRY”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69

Title

REDUCING THORN CONTAMINATION IN MACHINE HARVESTED 'MARION' BLACKBERRY

B. Strik; G. Buller Acta Horticulturae 2002. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2002.585.112

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Rotary harvesting followed by brushing removed 2.8 kg debris per plot in alternate-year fields.
Intervention effect Rotary harvesting followed by brushing removed 0.8 kg debris per plot in every-year fields.
Intervention effect Brushing alone removed 0.7 kg per plot in both every-year and alternate-year systems.
Intervention effect Treatments did not affect thorn contamination in harvested fruit.
Intervention effect Machine harvesting followed by brushing reduced petioles per plot by 66% against untreated controls in alternate-year fields.
Observation Petiole contaminants were lower in every-year fields.
Intervention effect Treatments did not affect petiole contaminants in every-year fields.
Recommendation Winter rotary harvesting followed by brushing shows promise for reducing subsequent petiole thorn contaminants, particularly in alternate-year fields.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two endpoint treatments had nearly equal yield in 1949 to 51.

Taxon: Satsuma orangeCitrus unshiut0
Treatment: 0% green manuret0 e1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: nearly equale0
Qualifier: following three years (1949 to 51)e0
Comparator: 100% green manuree1

Verbatim

e0
“nearly equal to the latter for the following three years (1949 to 51)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1172

e1
“The yield in the 0% green manure plot was larger than that in the 100% green manure plot for the first three years (1946 to 48)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1101

t0
“Satsuma orange”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66

Title

Effects of long-term application of green manure on Satsuma orange. I

T. SAKAMOTO; S. OKUCHI; T. YAMAMOTO; et al. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1961. doi:10.2503/jjshs.30.215

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Chemical fertilizer alone yielded more than full green manure in 1946 to 48.
Intervention effect Full green manure yielded more than chemical fertilizer alone since 1952.
Intervention effect Intermediate green manure proportions produced intermediate yields.
Intervention effect Since 1953, the 25% plot approached the 0% plot in yield.
Intervention effect Since 1953, the 75% plot approached the full green manure plot in yield.
Observation Trees in the 0% plot gradually lost vigor and were exhausted by 1957.
Intervention effect The 50% plot had intermediate yield.
Association More green manure was associated with larger fruit size.
Association More green manure was associated with flatter fruit shape.
Intervention effect Fruit growth was better with full green manure than none.
Association Larger green manure amounts reduced storage loss due to molds.
Association Tree volume was larger with larger green manure amounts.
Association Trunk circumference was larger with larger green manure amounts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry bean yield and fruit health and abortion did not differ between full sun and shade.

Taxon: cocoaTheobroma cacaot0
Treatment: full sun and shade treatmentse0
Outcome: dry bean yield (±2,000 kg/ha), fruit healthy and abortion rate per plote0
Direction: unaffectede0
Value: ±2,000 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“cocoa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–13

e0
“Generative parameters, such as dry bean yield (±2,000 kg/ha), fruit healthy and abortion rate per plot, were unaffected by full sun and shade treatments.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–968

Title

Growing cocoa in semi-arid climate and the rhythmicity of stem growth and leaf flushing determined by dendrometers

Thainná Waldburger; Thomas Anken; Achim Walter; et al. Heliyon 2024. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32266

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Fruit abortion rates were about 60%.
Association Stem growth decreased during new leaf flushing.
Association Maximum daily stem shrinkage decreased during new leaf flushing.
Association Fruit abortion increased during early leaf flushing stages.
Observation Dendrometers can quantify the effect of leaf flushing on stem growth.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green tea quality differed little among experimental plots and Multi-F.

Taxon: green teae1
Outcome: qualities of green teae1
Direction: smalle0
Comparator: Multi-F plote0

Verbatim

e0
“difference between experimental plots and Multi-F plot were to be small.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1024

e1
“qualities of green tea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–940

Title

Effects of Curtailment of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Biological Properties and Tea Leaf Yield in Acid Tea Field Soils

Shinjiro Kanazawa; Gi-Hong An; Toshiyuki Kaizu Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2005.tb00089.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

“yield/plot”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics