View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stimulate® spraying lessened the decrease in relative water content under water limitation.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 t1 “plants sprayed with Stimulate® ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic adjustment was presented as the cause of the smaller decrease in relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Qualifierosmotic adjustment e0 Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease s pigment content and relative water content .
TreatmentSalinity stress e1 Outcomephotosynthetic pigments contents and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the photosynthetic pigments content s and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–815 e1 “Salinity stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–538 t0 “Carpinus turczaninowii L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
MaterialH6 and Gharashani e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlower decrease e0 Comparatorsensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity substantially decrease d root relative water content .
Treatmentincrease in salinity levels e0 Outcomeroot relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in salinity levels resulted in a substantial decrease in root relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–481 e1 “Walnut ( J. regia L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d nearly 16 percent during dehydration.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in relative water content of nearly 16% during dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–359 t0 “Parkinsonia aculeata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential and relative water content fell with drought.
Treatmentdrought stress e0 Outcomeleaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 e0 “A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with in creasing drought stress levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity decrease d relative water content and water potential.
Outcomerelative water content and water potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “High salinity led also to a decrease in the relative water content and water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1222 t0 “Calligonum caput-medusae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–147 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content .
Treatmentwatering regimes e1 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–554 e1 “The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different water ing regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.