View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Very low light intensities inhibited decoated seeds.
TreatmentVery low light intensities e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Very low light intensities sufficed to inhibit decoated seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1546 t0 “CITRULLUS COLOCYNTHIS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–58 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Green light or low light intensities slightly promoted peach flower bud opening.
TreatmentGreen light or low light intensities e3 OutcomeFlower bud opening e2 Directionslightly promoted e3 Verbatim
e0 “Peach leaf and flower buds showed different light requirements for opening ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–83 e2 “Flower bud opening was relatively light independent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–219 e3 “Green light or low light intensities slightly promoted it, while red and white light or high intensities caused some inhibition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–348 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Low light intensities stimulated maximum hardiness.
TreatmentRelatively low light intensities e0 Outcomemaximum hardiness e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Relatively low light intensities and short photoperiods stimulated maximum hardiness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–488 t0 “Hedera helix L. var. Thorndale ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–71 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Light -source age had no effect on barley apical development at comparable light intensities .
Treatmentage of the light source e0 Outcomeapical development e0 Comparatorcomparable light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “The age of the light source had no effect on apical development under comparable light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–656 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight of all plant organs was increased by high light intensities .
Treatmenthigh light intensities e0 Outcomedry weight of all plant organs e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The dry weight of all plant organs was augmented by high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1140 t0 “Scrophularia Marilandica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plants at recommended light intensities had the largest chlorophyll contents.
Taxonshade-requiring greenhouse crops t0 Treatmentrecommended light intensities e0 Outcomechlorophyll contents e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Largest chlorophyll contents were found in plants receiving recommended light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–777 t0 “shade-requiring greenhouse crops ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–108 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Such low light intensities may prevent the invasion of other plant species.
Outcomethe invasion of other plant species e5 QualifierSuch low light intensities e5 Verbatim
e0 “Sasa kurilensis community at Mt. Waisuhorun ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–140 e5 “Such low light intensities can prevent the invasion of other plant species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1131 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RGR, NAR and LAR differed significantly between Lolium populations at both light intensities .
OutcomeRGR, NAR, and LAR e1 Verbatim
t0 “Lolium Populations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50 e1 “Significant differences between populations were found for RGR, NAR, and LAR at both light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–458 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Unit leaf rate curves for field and cabinet conditions are closely similar at very low light intensities and diverge at higher intensities .
Qualifierat higher intensities e1 Verbatim
e0 “growth of Impatiens parviflora DC in the laboratory ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–99 e1 “While closely similar at very low intensities , the curves rapidly diverge at higher intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2539 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Other selections had unchanged responses at lower light intensities .
TaxonTownsville lucerne t0 Treatmentlower light intensities e0 Outcomeresponse of the other selections e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The response of the other selections was not altered at the lower light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–767 t0 “Townsville lucerne ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–31 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.