View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities .
low light intensities e1 degree of inhibition e1 high light intensities e1 Verbatim
e1 “The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–736 e2 “in isolated spinach chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–107 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High light intensities cause photoinhibition in tea.
photoinhibition occurs e0 high light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “photoinhibition occurs at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–880 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–20 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities , but not at winter light intensities .
deeper penetration of light in the canopy e0 crop photosynthesis e0 high light intensities (summer) e0 low light intensities (winter) e0 Verbatim
e0 “At high light intensities (summer) deeper penetration of light in the canopy improves crop photosynthesis, but not at low light intensities (winter). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1693 e1 “greenhouse-grown tomato crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–568 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lawn grasses responded differently to the various light intensities in the growth characters measured.
various light intensities e0 responded to various light intensities differently e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Lawn grasses responded to various light intensities differently ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1297 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Urediniospore production of Puccinia striiformis on wheat was much lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities .
low light intensities e1 Urediniospore production e1 high light intensities e1 Verbatim
t1 “Puccinia striiformis on wheat
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–104 e1 “Urediniospore production by Puccinia striiformis on wheat per unit leaf area infected was much lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of low- light grown plants responded slowly to varied light intensities , whereas plants grown under natural light were more sensitive to changing light intensities .
young grape plants e1 varied light intensities e1 Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance e1 responded slowly e1 natural light environment e1 Verbatim
e1 “Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance responded slowly to varied light intensities , whereas the young grape plants grown under natural light environment were more sensitive to changing light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1005 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyptostrobus is judged adapted to higher light intensities .
adapted to higher light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Glyptostrobus is adapted to higher light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–936 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot length decreased at higher light intensities .
higher light intensities e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At higher light intensities , shoot length decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–701 t0 “red rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–81 Other claims from this paper (11) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that Mentha arvensis is best grown under low light intensities .
best grown under low light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mentha arvensis is best grown under low light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1373 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Kohlrabi anthocyanin concentration was greater at higher than lower light intensities .
increasing light intensities e0 total concentration of anthocyanins e0 lower light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “For kohlrabi, with increasing light intensities , the total concentration of anthocyanins was greater compared with those grown under lower light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1942 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Spinacia oleracea
Solanum lycopersicum
Triticum aestivum
Puccinia striiformis
Glyptostrobus
Mentha arvensis
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes