View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling lowered leaf relative water content by as much as 23%.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a concomitant decrease of as much as 23% in leaf relative water content (RWC) in dicated that root cooling affected stomatal closure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1171 t0 “Artemisia tridentata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content declined in the order maize, Japanese millet, sorghum, pearl millet as water or osmotic potential declined.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Qualifierdecrease of either Ψ or π e0 Not reported Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “The decreasing order of relative water content with a decrease of either Ψ or π was as follows : maize>Japanese millet>sorghum>pearl millet. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1094 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In fection by Puccinia lagenophorae significantly decrease d relative water content of Senecio glaucus leaves.
Outcomerelative water content e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Puccinia lagenophorae , in fecting Senecio glaucus and Albugo Candida in fecting Cakile maritima during late in fection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–452 e1 “The in fection of Senecio caused a significant decrease of relative water content , while the in fection of Cakile caused a nonsignificant decrease of the same parameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–770 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Control pear leaf water potential and relative water content at turgor loss tended to decline from spring to summer.
OutcomeLeaf water potential (Psi(pi) (0)) and relative water content (R(0)) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf water potential (Psi(pi) (0)) and relative water content (R(0)) at the turgor loss point of control leaves tended to decrease from spring to summer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1022 e1 “pear trees (Pyrus communis L. cv. "Barlett") ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–125 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Solute levels related more closely to declining relative water content than declining leaf water potential.
Directionmore closely related e0 Comparatorleaf water potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “Solute levels, in general, were more closely related to the decrease in relative water content than to a decrease in leaf water potential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1554 t0 “barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 47–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nickel lowered water potential and relative water content in both cultivars, more strongly in Adamello.
Material‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)] e1 Outcomewater potential (ψw) and relative water content (RWC) e0 Qualifiergreater in the DS cultivar e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Nickel caused a decrease in the water potential (ψw) and relative water content (RWC) in both cultivars, but these decrease s were greater in the DS cultivar. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1003 e1 “‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–268 t0 “durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water withholding lowered RWC to about 50%.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there is a steady decrease in relative water content (RWC), reaching about 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–651 e1 “Xerosicyos danguyi H.Humb. (Cucurbitaceae) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d ascorbate content in pea nodules by 59% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “ascorbate (59%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–764 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d NADP+ content in pea nodules by 31% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “NADP+ (31%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–844 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d NADPH content in pea nodules by 17% relative to well- water ed plants.
Verbatim
t0 “Pea Nodules Subjected to Water Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 e0 “Drought also caused a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–565 e1 “NADPH (17%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–861 e2 “well- water ed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–290 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.