View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root relative water content fell 11.13% versus control.
relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dust decrease d leaf relative water content in N. schoberi by 8%.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Dust caused a significant decrease of 21% and 19%, respectively, in the total chlorophyll of N. schoberi and S. rosmarinus , an 8% decrease in leaf relative water content , a 7% decrease in the APTI of N. schoberi , and a decrease of 26 and 17% in protein content of H. aphyllum and N. schoberi , respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–975 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water limitation decrease d wheat grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, photosystem II efficiency and relative water content .
water limitation e0 grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “water limitation led to a decrease in the grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–695 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content showed a minor decrease under in creasing NaCl doses.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “How chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × grandiflorum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 e1 “Plants were grown in substrate supplemented with NaCl doses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–275 e2 “A dose-dependent significant reduction of growth and minor decrease of leaf RWC were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–767 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Oil effects in cluded reduced chlorophyll and relative water content and electrolyte leakage.
chlorophyll and relative water content, electrolyte leakage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in chlorophyll and relative water content , electrolyte leakage and high levels of MDA and proline were in dicators of the oxidative effects of EOs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1698 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rainfed conditions decrease d leaf relative water content by 25 %.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest decrease in the evaluated traits, such as chlorophyll (48 %), leaf relative water content (25 %), number of pods per plant (56 %), plant height (29 %) and canopy spread (24 %), was recorded under I2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1089 t0 “rapeseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
leaf relative water content e6 starts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d by 32.14%.
leaf tissue e0 relative water content RWC e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content RWC in leaf tissue (by 32.14%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–831 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content fell as drought in tervals in creased in both Basella species.
drought stress interval e0 Relative Water Content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was a decrease in the Relative Water Content (RWC) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) as the drought stress in terval in creases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–897 t0 “Basella alba L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
S1 irrigation level e0 relative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Nitraria schoberi
Triticum aestivum.jpeg?width=60){kind=small}
Chrysanthemum
Basella alba
Carthamus tinctorius