View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Any in crease or decrease in sowing rates away from the optimum led to a decrease in amaranth yield.
Treatmentincrease or decrease in sowing rates e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Any in crease or decrease in sowing rates led to a decrease in the yield level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1973 t0 “Amaranth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–8 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Amaranth field uniformity fell from 70% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 60% at 1.2 million seeds/ha, a 10% decrease. Intervention effect At the seedling stage amaranth had 14 plants at a 0.2 million seeds/ha sowing rate, rising to 72 plants/m2 at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Intervention effect Amaranth plant survival during the vegetation period fell sharply with increasing sowing density, from 86% at 0.2 million seeds/ha to 45% at 1.2 million seeds/ha. Observation Before harvesting, amaranth plant density was adjusted to 12-32 plants/m2. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was 21 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 20.4 g. Observation The best combination of yield structure elements was also found at 26 plants/m2, with a grain weight per plant of 16.1 g. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.28 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.4 million seeds/ha. Observation The highest grain yield of amaranth variety Kharkivskyi 1, 4.20 t/ha, was obtained at a sowing rate of 0.6 million seeds/ha. Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease d air temperature caused a decrease in potential photochemical efficiency.
Outcomepotential photochemical efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in air temperature caused a decrease in potential photochemical efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1518 t0 “common hazel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A sharp NP decrease reduced efficiency.
Treatmenta sharp decrease in NP e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a sharp decrease in NP led to a decrease in efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1627 t0 “grain crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–141 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield.
Treatmenttotal precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yields by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in zein fractions under low nitrogen was offset by a large decrease in grain protein content.
Treatmentlow N conditions e0 Outcomegrain protein content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The advantages of a decrease in zein fractions in QPM under low N conditions were offset by a large decrease in grain protein content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1255 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 30% output price decrease reduced in tercropping BCR by 30%.
Treatmentdecrease in output prices e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A 30% decrease in the former leads to a decrease in NPV and BCR by 38% and 30%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1535 e1 “decrease in output prices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1407 e2 “Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.)) and Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–274 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A 30% output price decrease reduced in tercropping NPV by 38%.
Treatmentdecrease in output prices e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A 30% decrease in the former leads to a decrease in NPV and BCR by 38% and 30%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1535 e1 “decrease in output prices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1407 e2 “Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.)) and Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–274 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 1440 g/10 a of boron, a decrease in seeds per pod was also in volved in the yield decrease .
Treatment1440 g/10 aの施用区 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “1440 g/10 aの施用区では一莢内粒数の低下も関与した ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–544 t0 “Kidney Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Exposure caused a modest biomass decrease .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Despite a modest biomass decrease and alterations in membrane properties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–902 e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–603 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Asparagus adscendens showed a 70% decrease relative to other species.
Comparatorother species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Asparagus adscendens showed decrease by 70% in comparison to other species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1324 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.