View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity caused a stronger decrease in relative water content without leaching.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionstronger decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “HSS-HWS determined a stronger decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content under No SL than SL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–998 t0 “Sorghum bicolor ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed a significant decrease in relative water content of 7.45%.
Treatmentdrought-stressed e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In drought-stressed alfalfa plants, we observed a significant decrease in the relative water content (7.45%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1057 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results obtained showed that the effects of water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–365 t0 “ALFALFA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll and relative water content of tomato tended to decrease as stress level in creased.
Treatmentincrease in stress level e5 Outcomechlorophyll and the relative water content e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “tomato genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 e5 “physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease , while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to in crease following an in crease in stress level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1211 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was a decrease in relative water content , chlorophyll content , antioxidant enzymes, protein, and mineral nutrient elements. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1475 t0 “peanut tolerance to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–68 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed Thymus pannonicus showed a significant decrease in relative water content compared with the control.
Treatmentdrought-stressed treatments e1 Outcomerelative water content e1 Verbatim
e0 “on Thymus pannonicus , a resilient perennial herb native to the Pannonian vegetation region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–193 e1 “a notable decrease (p < 0.05) in relative water content was seen in drought-stressed treatments compared to the to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1028 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.
MaterialICC 249 & ICC 247 e0 Treatmentsalinity stress t0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039 t0 “Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress decrease d relative water content by 48%.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DS in itially caused a 48% decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–826 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced chickpea chlorophyll content , relative water content and water retention capacity.
Treatmentsalinity stress e0 Outcomechlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salinity stress which in cluded a reduction in chlorophyll content , a decrease in relative water content , a decline in water retention capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1668 e1 “salinity stress on chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomerelative water content and chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A marked decrease in relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex was also observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1118 t0 “Sugar Beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–30 e1 “Water deficit hampered plant growth by reducing leaf area and leaf area in dex. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1023 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.