View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The computer procedure increased processing time .
time requirements for processing e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “time requirements for processing were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–881 t0 “Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The algorithm was precise and reduced processing time .
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The algorithm is precious and the processing time is decreased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–649 t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time decreased by 10 ms.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “processing time was reduced by 10 ms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1116 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated chitosan processing increased chitinase activity and retention time .
repeat processing e0 chitinase activity and retention time e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “after repeat processing chitinase activity and retention time both increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–349 t0 “crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Ultrasound affected hydration rate, equilibrium moisture and lag phase time , reducing the processing time by 50%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Beans Hydration and Germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–101 e0 “ultrasound affected them, reducing 50% of the processing time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–844 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time significantly affected early flowering of tobacco.
different processing time e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the effects of different processing time on early flowering of tobacco were significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–441 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The other processing tomato varieties among the 12 were suitable for one- time harvest.
suitable for one-time harvest e0 Verbatim
e0 “the others were suitable for one- time harvest in the 12 processing tomato varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–431 e1 “from12 processing tomato varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–192 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand picking working time for processing tomato reached 142.4 hrs/10a.
Verbatim
t0 “Processing Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74 e0 “working time has reached 142.4hrs/10a ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1280 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The segmentation approach has low inference time for near real- time processing .
near real-time processing e5 Verbatim
e1 “generate realistic and high resolution images of plant roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–267 e5 “low inference time for near real- time processing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1131 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The reduction effect of processing increased as processing time was extended.
processing time e2 Verbatim
t0 “Bambara Groundnut Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–156 e2 “the effect increased as processing time was elongated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–643 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time interacted with sample load.
Momordica Charantia L. t0 microwave processing time and sample load e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “microwave processing time and sample load ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–737 t0 “Momordica Charantia L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–64 e1 “The interactions between the factors were as follows: there was some interaction between microwave power and microwave processing time , microwave processing time and sample load ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–737 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Processing time was important for canned apricot texture.
processing time e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Important factors influencing canned texture were ripeness level of the fresh fruit and processing time . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–254 t0 “Apricots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–45 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend harvesting ripe grapes and minimizing time before processing .
grapes ripe e0 time elapsed before processing minimised e0 Verbatim
e0 “Harvesting must be done at grapes ripe and time elapsed before processing minimised ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1163 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend standardizing processing time to avoid variation in effective ingredients.
Radix Polygonum Muhiflorum e0 time for processing of Radix Polygonum Muhiflorum should be standardized e0 Verbatim
e0 “The time for processing of Radix Polygonum Muhiflorum should be standardized to avoid significant variation of effective ingredients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–700 Other claims from this paper (2) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The indicated low temperature processing time was 48 hours at 4 ℃.
processing time is 48 hours in 4 ℃ e0 Verbatim
e0 “the processing time is 48 hours in 4 ℃ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–514 t0 “Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The 2-hour lag is attributed largely to a longer processing time during which newly synthesized RNA is packaged into ribosomes.
longer processing time during which newly synthesized RNA is packaged into ribosomes e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 2-hour lag is due in large part to a longer processing time during which newly synthesized RNA is packaged into ribosomes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–930 t0 “Soybean Suspension Cultures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–54 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Scanning electron microscope analysis of feeding holes suggested the longer feeding bouts were due to the pre- processing time needed to remove wax from the leaf surface.
the longer feeding bouts e0 pre‐processing time required to remove the wax from the leaf surface e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the longer feeding bouts were due to the pre‐ processing time required to remove the wax from the leaf surface ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–936 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Poor olive handling between harvest and processing causes the greatest olive oil deterioration.
deterioration of olive oil e0 during the time between harvesting and processing e0 Verbatim
e0 “The greatest deterioration of olive oil is due to poor handling of the olives during the time between harvesting and processing . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Nicotiana tabacum
Vigna subterranea
Prunus armeniaca
Glycine max
Olea