View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease sugarcane borer density .
Release of 1418 parasites/ha e0 Lixophaga diatraeae e2 biocontrol_agent did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease host density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–418 e1 “sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 e2 “a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Espalier training with a trellis in high density hedgerows did not decrease yield.
training to an espalier shape e0 does not decrease e0 with and without a trellis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “olives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 e0 “training to an espalier shape, with and without a trellis, in high density hedgerows, does not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–879 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
a third year without wheat e0 additional decrease e0 no additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield.
six plants per meter e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree diameter showed a marginal, non-significant decrease with in creasing planting density .
planting density e3 500 trees per hectare e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 e1 “Rubber was planted in three high densities, i.e., 600, 700 and 800 trees per hectare, with the presently recommended level of 500 trees per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1277 e3 “Though not statistically significant, there was a marginal decrease in tree diameter with the in crease in planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2004 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum melongenat0
Prunus cerasus
Triticum aestivum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Diatraea saccharalis
Olea
Avena
Phaseolus vulgaris
Hevea brasiliensis