Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compounds with little or no selective advantage are discarded.

Taxon: Asteridaeasteridst0
Outcome: discardede0

Verbatim

e0
“Compounds providing little or no selective advantage are discarded”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–516

t0
“Asteridae”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39

Title

Chemical evolution within the Asteridae

M. Daniel; S. D. Sabnis Journal of Palaeosciences 1992. doi:10.54991/jop.1992.1121

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing soil with sediments offered little yield advantage.

Taxon: sudangrassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Outcome: yield advantagee0
Direction: littlee0

Verbatim

e0
“There appeared to be little yield advantage in mixing soil with sediments.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1054

t0
“on sudangrass yields.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–164

Title

Agronomic use of scrubber sludge and soil as amendments to Lake Springfield sediment dredgings

Kenneth R. Olson; Robert L. Jones Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1987. doi:10.1080/00224561.1987.12456040

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Sediment gave higher sudangrass yield than soil at the first cutting.
Intervention effect Two percent scrubber sludge produced the highest average yield across soil and sediment combinations.
Intervention effect Eight percent scrubber sludge sharply lowered yield across soil and sediment combinations.
Observation Eight percent scrubber sludge adversely affected plant size and color.
Intervention effect At the second and third cuttings, soil with 8% scrubber sludge gave the highest yields.
Intervention effect Sediment with 8% scrubber sludge continued to have lower yields than other treatments.
Intervention effect Soil alone outyielded sediment alone at the second and third cuttings.
Observation Total weight across three cuttings suggested sediment was better than soil for sudangrass growth.
Intervention effect Scrubber sludge increased sudangrass yield in soil-rich combinations.
Observation Scrubber sludge had little effect on yield in sediment-rich combinations.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Organ / stage: upper leavese0
Outcome: advantagee0

Verbatim

e0
“little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516

t0
“corn leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Influence of sulfur deficiency on chlorophyll‐meter readings of corn leaves

Agustín Pagani; Hernán E. Echeverría Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2012. doi:10.1002/jpln.201100161

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Sulfur application increased aboveground biomass.
Intervention effect Sulfur application increased leaf sulfur concentration.
Intervention effect Sulfur application increased chlorophyll meter readings.
Association Leaf sulfur concentration was positively related to chlorophyll meter readings.
Association The sulfur sufficiency index from middle leaves was associated with biomass, with R² 0.58.
Association The sulfur sufficiency index from upper leaves was associated with biomass, with R² 0.62.
Method / resource Leaf greenness could indicate corn sulfur status under nutrient sufficiency and severe sulfur stress.

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitors added to surface banded urea solution showed little advantage.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Treatment: inhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surfacee0
Outcome: little advantagee0

Verbatim

e0
“The data show little advantage for inhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surface”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–909

t0
“Corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Performance of Some Urease Inhibitors in Field Trials with Corn

F. E. Broadbent; T. Nakashima; Grace Y. Chang Soil Science Society of America Journal 1985. doi:10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900020015x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect PPD increased corn grain yield versus urea alone, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect PPD increased corn total dry matter versus urea alone, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect PPD increased corn total and fertilizer nitrogen uptake versus urea alone, without statistical significance.
Intervention effect Cultivation increased corn total dry matter and grain yield relative to zero tillage.
Intervention effect Cultivation increased corn nitrogen uptake relative to zero tillage.
Intervention effect No tested urease inhibitor improved nitrogen uptake relative to urea alone.
Observation TPD coating on broadcast solid urea showed promise.
Observation DPT coating on broadcast solid urea showed promise.
Observation Soils with wheat straw or corn residues had lower applied nitrogen recoveries than bare soil.
Observation The soil analyses found no clear effect of urease inhibitors on soil urea levels.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interplanting soybeans with sorgo or corn had little overall advantage.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment: interplanting of soybeans in the row with sorgo or corne0
Outcome: little overall advantagee0
Setting: Illinoise0

Verbatim

e0
“little overall advantage for interplanting of soybeans in the row with sorgo or corn in Illinois”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–337

Title

Interplanting of corn, sorghum, and soybeans for silage. Volume 150 of Research bulletin

D. G. Cummins 1973

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Taxon: millete0
Outcome: little advantagee0
Comparator: spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Verbatim

e0
“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596

Title

The yield, quality and irrigation response of summer forage crops suitable for a dairy pasture renovation program in north-western Tasmania

R. J. Eckard; A. A. Salardini; M. Hannah; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001. doi:10.1071/ea00053

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Oats offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.
Observation Turnips were superior for forage needed from late January except for low bulb protein.
Intervention effect Turnips responded significantly to irrigation at 15 to 22 kg dry matter per irrigation millimeter.
Observation Turnip dryland yield ranged from 7.9 to 10.6 t dry matter per hectare.
Observation Turnip irrigated yield ranged from 13.5 to 14.4 t dry matter per hectare.
Observation Turnip shoot metabolizable energy was 12.5 MJ/kg dry matter.
Observation Turnip shoot crude protein was 12.4%.
Observation Turnip bulb metabolizable energy was 13.4 MJ/kg dry matter.
Observation Turnip bulb crude protein was 7.0%.
Observation Other fodder crops yielded 4 to 6 t dry matter per hectare under dryland conditions.
Observation Other fodder crops yielded 5 to 7 t dry matter per hectare when irrigated.
Observation Turnips were the most economic forage at A$120/t DM irrigated.
Observation Turnips cost $160/t DM dryland.
Observation Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated.
Observation Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $344/t DM dryland.
Recommendation Turnips were considered most suitable summer fodder under irrigation or dryland management.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.

Taxon: oatsAvena sativae0
Outcome: little advantagee0
Comparator: spring-sown ryegrass pasturee0

Verbatim

e0
“there is little advantage in establishing millet or oats over a spring-sown ryegrass pasture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–596

Title

The yield, quality and irrigation response of summer forage crops suitable for a dairy pasture renovation program in north-western Tasmania

R. J. Eckard; A. A. Salardini; M. Hannah; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2001. doi:10.1071/ea00053

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation Millet offered little advantage over spring sown ryegrass for summer forage.
Observation Turnips were superior for forage needed from late January except for low bulb protein.
Intervention effect Turnips responded significantly to irrigation at 15 to 22 kg dry matter per irrigation millimeter.
Observation Turnip dryland yield ranged from 7.9 to 10.6 t dry matter per hectare.
Observation Turnip irrigated yield ranged from 13.5 to 14.4 t dry matter per hectare.
Observation Turnip shoot metabolizable energy was 12.5 MJ/kg dry matter.
Observation Turnip shoot crude protein was 12.4%.
Observation Turnip bulb metabolizable energy was 13.4 MJ/kg dry matter.
Observation Turnip bulb crude protein was 7.0%.
Observation Other fodder crops yielded 4 to 6 t dry matter per hectare under dryland conditions.
Observation Other fodder crops yielded 5 to 7 t dry matter per hectare when irrigated.
Observation Turnips were the most economic forage at A$120/t DM irrigated.
Observation Turnips cost $160/t DM dryland.
Observation Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $385/t DM irrigated.
Observation Spring renovation with perennial ryegrass cost $344/t DM dryland.
Recommendation Turnips were considered most suitable summer fodder under irrigation or dryland management.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Cone traits that differed between cone types conferred little seed survival advantage under simulated fire.

Taxon: conifersPinopsidat0
Treatment: simulated firee2
Outcome: seed survival advantagee2
Qualifier: littlee2

Verbatim

t0
“serotinous and nonserotinous conifers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–97

e2
“those that differed (e.g. density and moisture) conferred little seed survival advantage under simulated fire”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–775

Title

Cone allometry and seed protection from fire are similar in serotinous and nonserotinous conifers

David F. Greene; Jeffrey M. Kane; Edith Pounden; et al. New Phytologist 2024. doi:10.1111/nph.19578

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was little evidence of a similar nitrogen advantage after cowpeas.

Taxon: cowpeasVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome: little evidence of any similar advantagee0

Verbatim

e0
“Analyses of soil and crop showed that groundnuts increased nitrogen availability in the topsoil, but there was little evidence of any similar advantage after cowpeas.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–497

Title

Effects of Previous Crop on Yield and Nitrogen Response of Maize at Samaru, Nigeria

M. J. Jones Experimental Agriculture 1974. doi:10.1017/s0014479700006050

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Maize following groundnuts yielded more than maize following cotton.
Intervention effect Maize following cotton yielded more than maize following sorghum.
Intervention effect Maize following cotton yielded more than maize following cowpeas.
Intervention effect Groundnuts increased nitrogen availability in topsoil.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest heights of about 5 to 6 ft or less, hybrids offered little or no greenchop advantage.

Taxon: sudan hybridst0
Material: hybridse0
Outcome: little or no advantagee0
Direction: little or no advantagee0
Qualifier: about 5 to 6 ft or less in heighte0

Verbatim

e0
“if greenchop operators harvest their crop at about 5 to 6 ft or less in height, there is little or no advantage in using hybrids”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–660

t0
“Sudan Hybrids”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82

Title

Pasture and greenchop performance comparisons…: Piper Sudangrass and Sudan Hybrids Under Irrigation

Donald R. Sumner; Marble; E. J. Gregory DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 1965

Other claims from this paper (2)

“little advantage”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics