View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Glycine max ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d leaf relative water content .
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–701 t0 “Glycine max cv. Sambaiba
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 t1 “control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–570 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
drought treatments e0 relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Above a relative - water - content threshold, a slight decline in water content sharply reduced stomatal conductance.
above which a slight decrease in RWC e0 Not reported Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “a threshold of relative water content (RWC) was found, above which a slight decrease in RWC lead to a sharp reduction in g s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–547 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly reduced relative water content .
drought stress e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease in plant height, root length, leaf area, root and shoot fresh and dry weights, and RWC, and an in crease in CR under drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1048 t0 “soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Whole plant chilling decrease d relative water content and in creased proline over time.
whole‐chilled plants e0 shoot‐chilled plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Chill‐ in duced drought stress ( decrease in RWC and in crease in proline content ) developed with time in whole‐chilled plants, but not in shoot‐chilled plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–949 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decrease d by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties.
relative water content e3 in the least degree e2 Verbatim
t0 “in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163 e0 “0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285 e1 “The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decrease d by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477 e2 “Vita variety, this in dicator decrease d in the least degree – by 5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305 e3 “The relative water content (RWC) decrease d in all varieties under the action of salinity ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1119–1206 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 10%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
under water deficiency 60 e1 leaf relative water content e0 control plants (100% field capacity) e2 Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e1 “treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 e2 “when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d more significantly at the end of dehydration in Maverick.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “sensitivity of soybean cultivars for nitrogen fixation rates in response to soil drying ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–296 e3 “By comparing the RWC values, the decrease was more significant at the end of dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–896 e4 “which was monitored in Maverick ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–929 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c e1 leaf relative water content e0 control plants (100% field capacity) e2 Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e1 “treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 e2 “when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought and salt stress significantly reduced relative water content and water potential.
individual and combined treatments of drought and salt stress e0 relative water content, and water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “All physiological traits, relative water content , and water potential decrease d significantly in all soybean genotypes due to in dividual and combined treatments of drought and salt stress, with significantly less decrease in soybean genotypes G4620RX, DM45X61, and NARC-21. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1067 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxt0