Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS, TTA and bunch length had low repeatability.

Taxon: grapest0
Outcome: repeatability coefficientse0
Direction: 10we0

Verbatim

e0
“The traits TSS, TTA and bunch length presented 10w repeatability coefficients”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1105

t0
“grapes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58

Title

Estimates of repeatability and path coefficients on grapes

Patrícia Coelho de Souza Leão; João Gomes da Costa DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Trait repeatability estimates ranged from 0.4750 to 0.8372.
Observation Associated determination coefficients ranged from 81.9% to 96.26%.
Observation Other characters showed regular genotype performance across measurements.
Association Studied variables satisfactorily explained yield per plant in path analysis.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i was low.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Value: lowe0

Verbatim

e0
“repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i s were low”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1059

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62

Title

Repeatability of Stability Estimators for Grain Yield in Wheat

Md. Jalaluddin; S. A. Harrison Crop Science 1993. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300040017x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource Three stability estimators were not repeatable between environment subsets.
Method / resource Only b i and CV i were repeatable across environment subsets.
Method / resource CV i was unreliable for genotypic stability because its ranking followed mean yield ranking.
Method / resource Mean yield was the most repeatable genotypic character.
Recommendation Combined b i and mean yield may improve selection for yield stability.
Recommendation Low S 2 i or Type-4 variance may substitute when linear regression does not fit.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Method repeatability declined as species prevalence increased.

Outcome: method repeatabilitye0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: species prevalence increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Repeatability plots displayed lower method repeatability as species prevalence increased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1177

Title

Technical note: Comparing 4 techniques for estimating desired grass species composition in horse pastures1

Laura Beth Kenny; Daniel Ward; Mark G Robson; et al. Journal of Animal Science 2018. doi:10.1093/jas/sky111

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting creeping bentgrass.
Method / resource The techniques did not differ in detecting orchardgrass.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting Kentucky bluegrass.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting tall fescue.
Method / resource Methods differed in detecting other.
Method / resource Five of 30 method pairs showed significant overall bias, including three LPI 3-50 versus EPED pairs.
Method / resource LPI 3-50 and LPI 5-30 agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
Method / resource StPt and EPED agreed perfectly in prevalence and bias.
Method / resource LPI 3-50 and EPED were the most dissimilar techniques.
Recommendation The authors selected StPt because it represented pastures thoroughly and was easy to use.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RŠ had the smallest repeatability.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Direction: smalleste0
Setting: RŠe0

Verbatim

e0
“The location RŠ presented the smallest repeatability.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1083

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42

Title

Identification of the most desirable maize testing environments in northern Serbia

Stanisavljevic Dusan; Mitrovic Bojan; Mirosavljevic Milan; et al. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo 2013. doi:10.5937/ratpov50-4181

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Genotype and environment effects were significant every year.
Association Genotype by environment interaction was significant in 2007, 2009 and 2011.
Observation SO provided the smallest amount of information on average.
Recommendation The authors conclude SO can be excluded from further trials.
Observation SM and RU were the most similar locations.
Recommendation Only one of SM and RU should be included in further trials.
Recommendation More locations are necessary for more detailed analysis.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gin reflectance repeatability was lower than laboratory repeatability.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Outcome: reflectance measurementse0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: laboratory measurementse0

Verbatim

e0
“reflectance measurements had a lower repeatability for the gin measurements than for the laboratory measurements.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1018

e1
“Samples were collected from the cotton during gin processing throughout the ginning seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–460

Title

Field Evaluation of Color/Trash Meters

W. S. Anthony Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1992. doi:10.13031/2013.26068

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource Gin meters operated without maintenance problems through the seasons.
Method / resource Trash repeatability was acceptable 72% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Reflectance repeatability was acceptable 49% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Yellowness repeatability was acceptable 79% of the time for gin meters.
Method / resource Laboratory meter trash repeatability was acceptable 75% of the time.
Method / resource Laboratory meter reflectance repeatability was acceptable 81% of the time.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin trash repeatability rose to 84%.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin reflectance repeatability rose to 73%.
Method / resource With doubled tolerances, gin yellowness repeatability rose to 87%.
Method / resource Color grades were estimated correctly about 55% of the time.
Method / resource Color grades were estimated within one grade 94% of the time.
Recommendation Video meters were judged usable for color and trash estimation in commercial ginning.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inexperienced raters had 0.93 repeatability.

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome: repeatabilitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.93e0

Verbatim

e0
“decreased repeatability (ρc = 0.93)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–863

t0
“lettuce”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85

Title

Accuracy, reliability, and timing of visual evaluations of decay in fresh-cut lettuce

Ivan Simko; Ryan J. Hayes PLoS ONE 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194635

Other claims from this paper (13)

Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.97 repeatability.
Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.92 reproducibility.
Method / resource Experienced raters had 0.96 accuracy.
Method / resource Inexperienced raters had 0.80 reproducibility.
Method / resource Inexperienced raters had 0.90 accuracy.
Method / resource 5.3% of ratings fell outside the 95% agreement limits.
Observation Aberrant ratings clustered at intermediate decay.
Method / resource Aberrant ratings ranged from 0.6% to 4.4% for experienced raters.
Method / resource Aberrant ratings ranged from 6.1% to 15.6% for inexperienced raters.
Recommendation The authors recommend training new raters with intermediate-decay examples, diagrams and experienced-rater consultation.
Method / resource Experienced-rater agreement supports use of visual decay ratings.
Recommendation The authors recommend multiple evaluation times until 42 days after processing and an AUDePS summary.
Method / resource The recommended approach lets experienced evaluators distinguish lettuce accessions and identify cultivars with reduced decay.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some RAPD bands had significant repeatability problems.

Taxon: GRAPE CULTIVARSt0
Outcome: repeatability for some bandse0
Comparator: some bandse0

Verbatim

e0
“significant problems with repeatability for some bands were observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–924

t0
“GRAPE CULTIVARS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–57

Title

MOLECULAR MARKERS FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF GRAPE CULTIVARS II

Y. Gogorcena; S. Arulsekar; D.E. Parfitt HortScience 1992. doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.6.660f

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Three RFLP probes showed cultivar polymorphisms.
Method / resource pGAD15 was the most useful probe, showing five polymorphisms among eight cultivars.
Method / resource RAPD primers revealed polymorphisms among grape cultivars.
Method / resource Season and extraction method did not account for marker inconsistency, which appeared more dependent on primer.
Observation The tested Pinot noir clones showed no clear genetic differences.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baugerod’s method lost precision and repeatability for conically shaped vegetables.

Taxon: vegetablese0
Outcome: precision and repeatabilitye0
Direction: loste0
Comparator: Baugerod's methode0

Verbatim

e0
“Baugerod's method lost precision and repeatability for the conically shaped vegetables.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1104

Title

205 Non-destructive Surface Area Determination of Vegetables

M.K. Upadhyaya; N.H. Furness HortScience 2000. doi:10.21273/hortsci.35.3.426c

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resource Method accuracy did not differ for carrots.
Method / resource Method accuracy did not differ for beets.
Method / resource Baugerod’s method differed significantly from the direct replica technique for parsnips.
Method / resource Image analysis differed significantly from the direct replica technique for cucumbers.
Method / resource A correction factor did not increase Baugerod method accuracy for any vegetable.
Method / resource The replica method lost precision and repeatability for cylindrical vegetables.
Method / resource Image analysis was precise and highly repeatable across vegetable shapes.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability was low to moderate across environments.

Taxon: CarrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome: repeatabilitye4
Value: low to moderatee4
Qualifier: across environmentse4

Verbatim

t0
“Carrot (Daucus carota L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–118

e4
“We found high levels of repeatability within a growing environment, with low to moderate repeatability across environments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1011

Title

An Automated Image Analysis Pipeline Enables Genetic Studies of Shoot and Root Morphology in Carrot (Daucus carota L.)

Sarah D. Turner; Shelby L. Ellison; Douglas A. Senalik; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01703

Other claims from this paper (7)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of cultivar rankings for S (1) and most AMMI statistics was low.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome: repeatability of cultivar rankingse0
Direction: lowe0
Comparator: S (1)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The repeatability of cultivar rankings for s 2 di , , S (1), and most AMMI statistics, estimated in different single‐ or two‐year periods were low”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1256

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54

Title

Repeatability of Yield Stability Statistics in Soybean

C. H. Sneller; L. Kilgore‐Norquest; D. Dombek Crop Science 1997. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700020013x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Genotype-by-environment interaction was significant.
Method / resource AMMI or regression partitions of GEI sums of squares were generally significant.
Method / resource All stability statistics detected significant cultivar differences.
Method / resource AMMI-derived statistics gave cultivar stability information similar to the named comparator statistics.
Method / resource Two regression coefficient statistics had moderate repeatability, especially over two years of environments.
Method / resource One AMMI-derived statistic had moderate repeatability, especially over two years of environments.
Recommendation The three moderately repeatable statistics may help select cultivars with predictable yield.

“repeatability”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics