View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel number per ear was independent of floral development stage at silking.
Organ / stagefloral development stage at siiking e0 OutcomeKernel number per ear e0 Verbatim
e0 “Kernel number per ear was independent of floral development stage at siiking ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1376 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hexose availability was not limiting for kernel set and development .
Organ / stagekernel setting and development e0 OutcomeHexose availability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Hexose availability was also no limiting factor for kernel setting and development . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1595 t0 “maize flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vacuolar fructan accumulation had no detectable effect on kernel development .
TreatmentAccumulation of fructan in the vacuole e0 Outcomekernel development e0 Directionno detectable effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Accumulation of fructan in the vacuole had no detectable effect on kernel development or germination. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–752 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CNI-1493 did not interfere with wheat kernel development .
Outcomekernel development e0 Directionwithout interference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “application during infection of wheat and maize flowers results in strong inhibition of the pathogen without interference with kernel development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 e1 “the inhibitor CNI-1493 in vitro ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–736 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CNI-1493 did not interfere with maize kernel development .
Outcomekernel development e0 Directionwithout interference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “application during infection of wheat and maize flowers results in strong inhibition of the pathogen without interference with kernel development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–883 e1 “the inhibitor CNI-1493 in vitro ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–736 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading 26–35 days after heading did not influence kernel development .
TreatmentShading of the sunlight at the later period of the kernel growth, 26-35 days after heading e0 Outcomekernel-development e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 e0 “Shading of the sunlight at the later period of the kernel growth, 26-35 days after heading no influences of the treatment to, the kernel - development was seen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2364–2521 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Differential spur stress was not reflected by persistent leaf nitrogen concentration or content during kernel development .
Outcomenitrogen concentration or content of persistent leaves e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “such differential stress was not reflected by the nitrogen concentration or content of persistent leaves during kernel development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1246 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leucine and valine feedback sensitivity did not change with kernel development .
Treatmentleucine + valine e0 Outcomesensitivity of both endosperm and embryo acetolactate synthase activities to feedback inhibition e0 Directiondid not change e0 Verbatim
e0 “The sensitivity of both endosperm and embryo acetolactate synthase activities to feedback inhibition by leucine + valine did not change during kernel development . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1201 t0 “maize ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dusting did not prevent kernel smudge in maturing crops.
Treatmentdusting the growing plants with sulphur e0 Outcomedevelopment of kernel smudge e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The development of kernel smudge in the maturing crop was not prevented by dusting the growing plants with sulphur. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2066 e1 “wheat, rye, and barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–40 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel DNA content had no apparent relationship with gene expression.
Outcomerelationship to gene expression e0 Directionno apparent relationship e0 Verbatim
e0 “but had no apparent relationship to gene expression. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1080 t0 “maize kernel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.