View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting.
efficient in light harvesting e0 Verbatim
e0 “but taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–740 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rock phosphate and superphosphate mixtures were no more efficient than separately applied components.
Mixtures of rock phosphate with superphosphate e0 not more efficient e0 equivalent amounts e0 separate components e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Mixtures of rock phosphate with superphosphate were not more efficient than equivalent amounts of the separate components used correctly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1475 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting.
efficient in light harvesting e1 not necessarily more efficient e1 Verbatim
e1 “In all stands light capture of plants increased with their above-ground biomass but taller species were not necessarily more efficient in light harvesting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–739 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No extractant was more efficient than the others in predicting Cu availability for wheat.
predicting Cu availability e4 no extractant was more efficient e4 Verbatim
e4 “although no extractant was more efficient in predicting Cu availability for wheat fertilized with the Cu sources tested ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1291 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without sulfite, sequential ADF was no more efficient than standard ADF for estimating hemicellulose.
estimating hemicellulose e0 not more efficient e0 absence of sulfite e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “In the absence of sulfite, sequential ADF was not more efficient than standard ADF in removing proteins bound to cell walls, nor was it more efficient at estimating hemicellulose as the difference between neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and ADF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Golden Delicious was not more yield efficient than Braeburn at most locations.
‘Golden Delicious’ e0 Verbatim
e0 “At the majority of locations, ‘Golden Delicious’ was more productive than ‘Braeburn,’ but not more yield- efficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2214 e1 “three apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–30 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without sulfite, sequential ADF was no more efficient than standard ADF at removing cell wall bound proteins.
removing proteins bound to cell walls e0 not more efficient e0 absence of sulfite e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “In the absence of sulfite, sequential ADF was not more efficient than standard ADF in removing proteins bound to cell walls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–711 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
More efficient chemicals gave a slightly, not significantly, higher yield.
more efficient chemicals e2 slightly, though not significantly e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “technological adaptation experiments carried out with durum wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–568 e2 “the use of more efficient chemicals led to a slightly, though not significantly, higher yield, with a lower N requirement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2213–2334 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated egg applications were no more efficient than one application of the same total egg number.
Multiple or repeated applications e0 no more efficient e0 no more efficient e0 a single application of an equivalent number of eggs e0 Verbatim
e0 “Multiple or repeated applications were no more efficient than a single application of an equivalent number of eggs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–788 e1 “Field-grown tomatoes were artificially infested with Heliothis zea (Boddie) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–75 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum fumigation with simultaneous air and fumigant admission was no more efficient than atmospheric-pressure fumigation.
Vacuum fumigation with simultaneous admission of air and fumigant e0 no more efficient e0 fumigation at atmospheric pressure e0 Verbatim
e0 “Vacuum fumigation with simultaneous admission of air and fumigant is no more efficient than fumigation at atmospheric pressure over the same period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–283 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Malus domestica
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Solanum lycopersicum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Helicoverpa zea