View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average total height , height growth and diameter at breast height did not differ significantly among black walnut families.
OutcomeAverage total height, height growth, and diameter at breast height e1 Verbatim
e0 “Average survival, 7-year stem diameter , and stem diameter growth differed significantly among 34 black walnut families planted in West Virginia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143 e1 “Average total height , height growth , and diameter at breast height were not significantly different among families ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–259 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
After 1984 fertilizer had no significant effect on Populus height growth , total height or diameter .
Outcomeheight growth, total height, or diameter e0 Directionno significant effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Populus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 e0 “After 1984, no significant effects of fertilizer on height growth , total height , or diameter were evident. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1256 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root pruning did not significantly affect height and root collar diameter growth after 80 days.
Outcomeheight and root collar diameter growth e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “After 80 days, root pruning did not significantly affect height and root collar diameter growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–688 t0 “kamagong ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–53 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Different manure applications had no significant effect on sugarcane growth height and stem diameter .
Treatmentdifferent manure applications e0 Outcomegrowth height and stem diameter e1 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “different manure applications had no significant effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–499 e1 “growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–439 t0 “Sugarcane Intercropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–34 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Annual diameter and height growth variations were reported as not significant, despite p = 0.005.
Outcomeaverage annual growth variations in terms of diameter and height e0 Comparatordiameter and height e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the average annual growth variations in terms of diameter and height are not significant (p = 0.005) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–770 t0 “Acacia senegal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–27 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Survival rate, height growth and collar diameter growth did not significantly differ with light intensity.
Treatmentincreasing light intensity e0 Outcomesurvival rate, height growth and collar diameter growth e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With increasing light intensity, number of branch was significantly increased, but no significant difference obtained in survival rate, height growth and collar diameter growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1082 t0 “Quercus castaneifolia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–68 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ash half-sib lines did not differ significantly in annual height and diameter growth .
Outcomeannual height and diameter growth e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Not reported Material
Verbatim
e0 “but showed no significant difference for annual height and diameter growth . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1838 t0 “Narrow-leaved ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl), one of the most important ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth .
Treatmenttwo release treatments e0 Outcomediameter and height growth response e0 Directiondid not differ e0 Comparatortwo release treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “The two release treatments did not differ significantly in diameter and height growth response, but statistically outperformed the control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–745 t0 “Green Ash ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–77 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Container differences in height and basal diameter were insignificant at the initial seedling growth stage.
Organ / stageinitial growing stage e0 Outcomeheight and basal diameter e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The results indicated that no insignificant differences were found height and basal diameter at the initial growing stage within the same tree seedlings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–315 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nursery source did not significantly affect oak height and diameter growth after two years.
Treatmentnursery source e0 Outcomeheight and diameter growth e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Qualifier2 years after outplanting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nursery source did not significantly affect seedling survival or height and diameter growth 2 years after outplanting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–529 t0 “Nuttall Oak ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.