Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hedera height did not differ statistically across light sources or intensities.

Taxon
Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeae0
Treatment
light sources and light intensitiese0
Outcome
heightse0
Direction
did not show differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Hedera rhombea heights did not show differences statistically as responses to light sources and light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–623

Title

Effects of Artificial Light Sources and Light Intensities in Subway Stations on the Growth of Hedera rhombea and Saxifraga stolonifera

Jin Hee Ju; Kwang Ja Bang Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 2008

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal stem diameter did not differ significantly among light intensities.

Taxon
Chinese firt0
Outcome
basal stem diametere0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Verbatim

t0

“Chinese fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64
e0

“basal stem diameter had no significant difference among diffe-rent light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–768

Title

[Response of seed germination and seedling growth of Chinese fir to different light intensities].

Qing Qing Liu; Xiang Qing Ma; Yan Juan Li; et al. PubMed 2016. doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201612.034

Other claims from this paper (15)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number did not differ significantly across light intensities.

Taxon
Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlingst0
Treatment
light intensitiese0
Outcome
number of leavese1
Direction
not signifi cantly differente0

Verbatim

t0

“Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131
e0

“was not signifi cantly different among light intensities (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–993
e1

“The number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–858

Title

Effects of Light Intensities on Growth Performance, Biomass Allocation and Chlorophyll Content of Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings in Lao PDR

Chanhsamone Phonguodume; Don Koo Lee; Silavanh Sawathvong; et al. http://journals.uplb.edu.ph/index.php/JESAM/article/download/705/645/ 2012

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight of Garcinia kola seedlings was not significantly affected by light intensities.

Taxon
Garcinia kolaGarcinia kolat0
Treatment
light intensitiese1
Outcome
Leaf Dry Weight (LDW)e1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Garcinia kola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36
e1

“Seedlings Leaf Dry Weight (LDW) under light intensities were not significantly affected (α=0.05) by different light intensities but significantly affect (α=0.05) the seedlings Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Root Dry Weight (RDW) and Total Dry Weight (TDW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–756

Title

Biomass accumulated by Garcinia kola Heckel. seedlings under different light intensities

OT Bolanle–Ojo; JO Ogunade; OA Williams; et al. Journal of Agriculture Forestry and the Social Sciences 2016. doi:10.4314/joafss.v12i2.16

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent and total photorespiration did not differ significantly across light intensities.

Outcome
differences between Rpa and Rpte0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between Rpa and Rpt at different light intensities(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–519
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37

Title

Response of Photorespiration of Wheat Flag Leaf to Light Intensities and CO_2 Concentrations

Kang Hua-jin Mailei zuowu xuebao 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination exceeded 74.4% without significant differences across light intensities.

Treatment
varying light intensitiese0
Outcome
final percent germinatione0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Value
74.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under varying light intensities, final percent germination of H. fruticosum showed no significant differences, with values always above 74.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1222

Title

Influence of light, temperature and water stress on germination of Hedysarum fruticosum

Y. Zheng; Z. Xie; Y. Gao; et al. South African Journal of Botany 2005. doi:10.1016/s0254-6299(15)30129-0

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensities did not significantly affect the biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
different light intensitiese0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
direct sunlight (100% light intensity)e1

Verbatim

e0

“The different light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter, leaf production and biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–613
e1

“control treatment was direct sunlight (100% light intensity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–365

Title

Seedling growth performance of Entandrophragma angolense (Welw.) C. DC as influenced by different light intensities

AO Adewunmi; OT Bolanle–Ojo; AO Oladejo Journal of Agriculture Forestry and the Social Sciences 2016. doi:10.4314/joafss.v12i2.20

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content did not differ significantly between low and high light intensities.

Taxon
H. coronariaHoya coronariae1
Treatment
high light intensitiese0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content was not significantly different between those grown at low and high light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1439
e1

“H. coronaria growing under higher light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1206

Title

Morfoanatomi Hoya coronaria Berbunga Kuning pada Perlakuan Intensitas Cahaya Berbeda

Robika; Monica Kharisma Swandi; Andre Sanputra; et al. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 2022. doi:10.47349/jbi/18012022/59

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter and leaf production of E. angolense seedlings.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
different light intensitiese0
Outcome
height, collar diameter, leaf productione0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
direct sunlight (100% light intensity)e1

Verbatim

e0

“The different light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter, leaf production and biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–613
e1

“control treatment was direct sunlight (100% light intensity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–365

Title

Seedling growth performance of Entandrophragma angolense (Welw.) C. DC as influenced by different light intensities

AO Adewunmi; OT Bolanle–Ojo; AO Oladejo Journal of Agriculture Forestry and the Social Sciences 2016. doi:10.4314/joafss.v12i2.20

Other claims from this paper (2)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass allocation did not differ significantly within or among species across light intensities.

Taxon
Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlingst0
Treatment
different light intensitiese0
Outcome
Biomass allocatione0
Direction
not signifi cantly differente0

Verbatim

t0

“Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131
e0

“Biomass allocation was not signifi cantly different within and among species (F=3.39, P=0.0665) under different light intensities (F=2.72, P=0.096).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1143

Title

Effects of Light Intensities on Growth Performance, Biomass Allocation and Chlorophyll Content of Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings in Lao PDR

Chanhsamone Phonguodume; Don Koo Lee; Silavanh Sawathvong; et al. http://journals.uplb.edu.ph/index.php/JESAM/article/download/705/645/ 2012

Other claims from this paper (15)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.