View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hedera height did not differ statistically across light sources or intensities .
Treatmentlight sources and light intensities e0 Directiondid not show differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Hedera rhombea heights did not show differences statistically as responses to light sources and light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–623 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal stem diameter did not differ significantly among light intensities .
Outcomebasal stem diameter e0 Directionno significant difference e0 Verbatim
t0 “Chinese fir ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 e0 “basal stem diameter had no significant difference among diffe-rent light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–768 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf number did not differ significantly across light intensities .
TaxonFive Tropical Deciduous Seedlings t0 Treatmentlight intensities e0 Outcomenumber of leaves e1 Directionnot signifi cantly different e0 Verbatim
t0 “Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 e0 “was not signifi cantly different among light intensities (p<0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–993 e1 “The number of leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–858 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf dry weight of Garcinia kola seedlings was not significantly affected by light intensities .
Treatmentlight intensities e1 OutcomeLeaf Dry Weight (LDW) e1 Directionnot significantly affected e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Garcinia kola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 e1 “Seedlings Leaf Dry Weight (LDW) under light intensities were not significantly affected (α=0.05) by different light intensities but significantly affect (α=0.05) the seedlings Stem Dry Weight (SDW), Root Dry Weight (RDW) and Total Dry Weight (TDW) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–756 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Apparent and total photorespiration did not differ significantly across light intensities .
Outcomedifferences between Rpa and Rpt e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no significant differences between Rpa and Rpt at different light intensities (P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–519 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Germination exceeded 74.4% without significant differences across light intensities .
Treatmentvarying light intensities e0 Outcomefinal percent germination e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under varying light intensities , final percent germination of H. fruticosum showed no significant differences, with values always above 74.4%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1222 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light intensities did not significantly affect the biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings.
Treatmentdifferent light intensities e0 Outcomebiomass accumulation e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Comparatordirect sunlight (100% light intensity) e1 Verbatim
e0 “The different light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter, leaf production and biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–613 e1 “control treatment was direct sunlight (100% light intensity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–365 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content did not differ significantly between low and high light intensities .
Treatmenthigh light intensities e0 Outcomechlorophyll content e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Verbatim
e0 “The chlorophyll content was not significantly different between those grown at low and high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1439 e1 “H. coronaria growing under higher light intensity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1206 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter and leaf production of E. angolense seedlings.
Treatmentdifferent light intensities e0 Outcomeheight, collar diameter, leaf production e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Comparatordirect sunlight (100% light intensity) e1 Verbatim
e0 “The different light intensities did not significantly affect the height, collar diameter, leaf production and biomass accumulation of E. angolense seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–613 e1 “control treatment was direct sunlight (100% light intensity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–365 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Biomass allocation did not differ significantly within or among species across light intensities .
TaxonFive Tropical Deciduous Seedlings t0 Treatmentdifferent light intensities e0 OutcomeBiomass allocation e0 Directionnot signifi cantly different e0 Verbatim
t0 “Five Tropical Deciduous Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–131 e0 “Biomass allocation was not signifi cantly different within and among species (F=3.39, P=0.0665) under different light intensities (F=2.72, P=0.096). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1143 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.