View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimized water and nitrogen supply improved nitrogen use efficiency , partial nitrogen production efficiency and water use efficiency .
optimized water and nitrogen supply e0 nitrogen use efficiency,partial nitrogen production efficiency,and the water use efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Greenhouse Winter-spring Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–133 e0 “optimized water and nitrogen supply improved nitrogen use efficiency , partial nitrogen production efficiency , and the water use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1678 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low nitrogen partial factor productivity and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency
Lower irrigation and nitrogen application rates e1 nitrogen partial factor productivity, and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The onion was use d as the test crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–710 e1 “Lower irrigation and nitrogen application rates mutually restricted the water and nitrogen utilization, resulting in low water use efficiency , irrigation water use efficiency , nitrogen partial factor productivity, and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2575 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Medium-to-high water-nitrogen combinations improved onion quality Intervention effect Excessive irrigation and nitrogen application inhibited bulb quality accumulation Intervention effect Yield and economic benefits increased with increasing irrigation amount Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application gave a diminishing yield-increasing effect Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application increased farm input costs Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application reduced economic benefits Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest onion yield, 136.93 t·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest economic benefits, 20,376.3 USD·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest net profit, 14,320.8 USD·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest onion yield, averaging 130.87 t·ha−1 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest economic benefits, averaging 28,449.5 USD·ha−1 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest net profit, averaging 21,881.5 USD·ha−1 Intervention effect Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency Association The relationship of irrigation amount and nitrogen rate with onion economic benefits fits a bivariate quadratic regression model Method / resource The regression model predicts onion economic benefits that are highly correlated with actual economic benefits Association Onion economic benefits show a parabolic trend as water and nitrogen inputs increase Method / resource Model optimisation gives onion economic benefits close to 27,000–29,000 USD·ha−1 at 100% irrigation and 264 kg·ha−1 nitrogen Recommendation The optimised water and nitrogen management model can be used as a technical reference for onion in the Hexi Oasis irrigation area Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency
Lower irrigation and nitrogen application rates e1 water use efficiency, irrigation water use efficiency e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The onion was use d as the test crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–710 e1 “Lower irrigation and nitrogen application rates mutually restricted the water and nitrogen utilization, resulting in low water use efficiency , irrigation water use efficiency , nitrogen partial factor productivity, and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2575 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Medium-to-high water-nitrogen combinations improved onion quality Intervention effect Excessive irrigation and nitrogen application inhibited bulb quality accumulation Intervention effect Yield and economic benefits increased with increasing irrigation amount Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application gave a diminishing yield-increasing effect Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application increased farm input costs Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen application reduced economic benefits Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest onion yield, 136.93 t·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest economic benefits, 20,376.3 USD·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect In 2020 the N3W3 treatment gave the highest net profit, 14,320.8 USD·ha−1, with no significant difference from N2W3 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest onion yield, averaging 130.87 t·ha−1 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest economic benefits, averaging 28,449.5 USD·ha−1 Intervention effect From 2021 to 2023 the N2W3 treatment gave the highest net profit, averaging 21,881.5 USD·ha−1 Intervention effect Lower irrigation and nitrogen rates gave low nitrogen partial factor productivity and nitrogen agronomic use efficiency Association The relationship of irrigation amount and nitrogen rate with onion economic benefits fits a bivariate quadratic regression model Method / resource The regression model predicts onion economic benefits that are highly correlated with actual economic benefits Association Onion economic benefits show a parabolic trend as water and nitrogen inputs increase Method / resource Model optimisation gives onion economic benefits close to 27,000–29,000 USD·ha−1 at 100% irrigation and 264 kg·ha−1 nitrogen Recommendation The optimised water and nitrogen management model can be used as a technical reference for onion in the Hexi Oasis irrigation area Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The production function accurately captured maize yield, water productivity and nitrogen partial factor productivity responses.
responses of yield, water productivity ( WP ), and nitrogen partial factor productivity ( NFP ) e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “the production function integrating actual evapotranspiration (ET c act ) and nitrogen application rate (N) accurately captured the responses of yield, water productivity ( WP ), and nitrogen partial factor productivity ( NFP ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1288 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimized water and nitrogen supply decreased luxury uptake of phosphorus and potassium.
optimized water and nitrogen supply e0 luxury uptake of phosphorous and potassium e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “optimized water and nitrogen supply improved nitrogen use efficiency , partial nitrogen production efficiency , and the water use efficiency ,while decreased luxury uptake of phosphorous and potassium for cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1750 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest partial factor productivity of nitrogen , 40.99 kg kg−1, on the two-year average.
partial factor productivity of nitrogen e4 Verbatim
e0 “drip irrigation for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–124 e4 “the I45N50–50 treatment also resulted in the highest water use efficiency (2.61 kg m−3), irrigation water use efficiency (3.74 kg m−3), and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (40.99 kg kg−1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1621 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation Optimized irrigation and N application regimes positively influenced wheat GY, ETc and water-N productivity. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2020–2021 was 9.72 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2021–2022 was 9.94 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation In 2020–2021, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 376.67 mm. Observation In 2021–2022, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 378.67 mm. Observation TOPSIS ranked the I45N50–50 treatment first as the best treatment, based on high GY and minimized ETc. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest water use efficiency, 2.61 kg m−3, on the two-year average. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest irrigation water use efficiency, 3.74 kg m−3, on the two-year average. Recommendation Splitting N as 50% basal and 50% topdressing with a 45 mm irrigation quota is an optional choice for winter wheat under drip irrigation. Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All cultivars showed a similar slope of regression lines between amount of transpired water and dry matter production ( water use efficiency ).
All the cultivars e3 slope of regression lines between amount of transpired water and dry matter production e3 Verbatim
e1 “Dissemination of New Rice for Africa (NERICA) has been in progress to improve production in upland rice ecosystem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–249 e2 “A pot experiment was conducted in a split plot design at university farm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–323 e3 “All the cultivars showed similar slope of regression lines between amount of transpired water and dry matter production ( Water use efficiency ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–947 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest water use efficiency , 2.61 kg m−3, on the two-year average.
water use efficiency e4 Verbatim
e0 “drip irrigation for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–124 e4 “the I45N50–50 treatment also resulted in the highest water use efficiency (2.61 kg m−3), irrigation water use efficiency (3.74 kg m−3), and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (40.99 kg kg−1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1621 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation Optimized irrigation and N application regimes positively influenced wheat GY, ETc and water-N productivity. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2020–2021 was 9.72 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2021–2022 was 9.94 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation In 2020–2021, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 376.67 mm. Observation In 2021–2022, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 378.67 mm. Observation TOPSIS ranked the I45N50–50 treatment first as the best treatment, based on high GY and minimized ETc. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest irrigation water use efficiency, 3.74 kg m−3, on the two-year average. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest partial factor productivity of nitrogen, 40.99 kg kg−1, on the two-year average. Recommendation Splitting N as 50% basal and 50% topdressing with a 45 mm irrigation quota is an optional choice for winter wheat under drip irrigation. Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest irrigation water use efficiency , 3.74 kg m−3, on the two-year average.
irrigation water use efficiency e4 Verbatim
e0 “drip irrigation for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–124 e4 “the I45N50–50 treatment also resulted in the highest water use efficiency (2.61 kg m−3), irrigation water use efficiency (3.74 kg m−3), and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (40.99 kg kg−1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1621 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation Optimized irrigation and N application regimes positively influenced wheat GY, ETc and water-N productivity. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2020–2021 was 9.72 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation The maximum grain yield in 2021–2022 was 9.94 t/ha, achieved with irrigation quota I45 and N application mode N50–50. Observation In 2020–2021, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 376.67 mm. Observation In 2021–2022, the I45N50–50 treatment had ETc of 378.67 mm. Observation TOPSIS ranked the I45N50–50 treatment first as the best treatment, based on high GY and minimized ETc. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest water use efficiency, 2.61 kg m−3, on the two-year average. Observation The I45N50–50 treatment had the highest partial factor productivity of nitrogen, 40.99 kg kg−1, on the two-year average. Recommendation Splitting N as 50% basal and 50% topdressing with a 45 mm irrigation quota is an optional choice for winter wheat under drip irrigation. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Water use efficiency of rice improved by 32% under intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer.
intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer e1 water use efficiency e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “global rice cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–106 e1 “the combination of intermittent irrigation with reduced slow-release fertilizer significantly suppressed non-productive tillers (productive tiller rate increased to 74.1%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–556 e5 “water use efficiency improved by 32% (1.24 kg/m³) and partial nitrogen productivity increased by 28.3% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–882 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cucumis sativust0
Allium cepa
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa