Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed microbial consortia plus 100% RDF gave higher gross returns of Rs.1,10,458 ha-1, on par with soil application plus RDF.

A claim from Effect of different nitrogen sources on yield and economics of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed microbial consortia plus 100% RDF gave higher gross returns of Rs.1,10,458 ha-1, on par with soil application plus RDF.

Treatment
100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) + seed treatment with microbial consortia (Rhizobium + PSB+ KRB+ ZnSB @ 25g seed -1)e1
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.1,10,458 ha-1e0
Comparator
100% RDF + soil application of microbial consortiae2

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“apart from higher gross returns (Rs.1,10,458 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 65508 ha-1) and B-C ratio (2.6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–746
e1

“application of 100% Recommended Dose of Fertilizer (RDF) + seed treatment with microbial consortia (Rhizobium + PSB+ KRB+ ZnSB @ 25g seed -1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–506
e2

“it was statistically on par with the application of 100% RDF + soil application of microbial consortia (Rhizobium + PSB+ KRB+ ZnSB @ 5 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–895

Title

Effect of different nitrogen sources on yield and economics of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)

Sruthi G; Balazzii Naaiik RVT; Bhanu Rekha K; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9h.1602

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-154cdeb9332979077d7e3ef0bdf483f88b801134cbf218f529ff38628a040bb8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

47 papers: 47 positive, 0 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.