Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NAA plus carbaryl significantly reduced fruit set by 26%.

A claim from `Empire' Apple Responses to Fruit-thinning Chemicals · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA plus carbaryl significantly reduced fruit set by 26%.

Treatment
NAA plus carbaryle0
Outcome
Fruit set (fruits per 100 blossom clusters)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit set (fruits per 100 blossom clusters) was reduced significantly by Accel at 50 ppm (17%) and by NAA plus carbaryl (26%) in comparison with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–653
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–14

Title

`Empire' Apple Responses to Fruit-thinning Chemicals

Warren C. Stiles HortScience 1995. doi:10.21273/hortsci.30.4.765e

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-1bebdc9feb7b5d8acd754eca344d5601c03bbe5bb384ddc8226ec4080a62b8d0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

carbaryl · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.