Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The stated optimum fertilizer application gave the highest maize yield of 9276 kg/ha.
Treatmenturea 390 kg/ha+calcium superphosphate 562.5 kg/ha+potassium chloride 300 kg/ha e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Comparator Setting Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “The optimum application of three fertilizers was urea 390 kg/ha+calcium superphosphate 562.5 kg/ha+potassium chloride 300 kg/ha. Which gave the highest yield of maize, i.e. 9276 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–331 Other claims from this paper (2) Record rev-1cb4fc4dc9c062fed3902be63d7a38d2b8e8f8365fcbfe2f73a7c64c574b211c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer
chloride · yield · Zea mays (maize) Results differ 9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction
no effect negative positive positive positive positive positive positive See all 9 papers → potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize) Positive and negative results 320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect
290 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
no effect negative no effect no effect no effect negative no effect no effect 311 papers more in this group
See all 320 papers → phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize) Positive and negative results 627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect
548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
no effect no effect negative no effect no effect no effect negative no effect 618 papers more in this group
See all 627 papers → 3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.