Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA at 50 ppm applied when berries averaged 5 mm was most effective for increasing berry weight and soluble solids and reducing shot berries.

A claim from Gibberellic Acid Sprays Increase Berry Size andReduce Shot Berry of ‘Vanessa’ Grapevines · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA at 50 ppm applied when berries averaged 5 mm was most effective for increasing berry weight and soluble solids and reducing shot berries.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Material
‘Vanessa’t0
Treatment
GA at 50 ppme0
Outcome
berry weight and fruit soluble solidse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
when berries averaged 5 mm in diametere0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of GA at 50 ppm when berries averaged 5 mm in diameter were most effective for increasing berry weight and fruit soluble solids while reducing the occurrence of shot berry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–812
t0

“‘Vanessa’ Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88
t1

“GA increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–476

Title

Gibberellic Acid Sprays Increase Berry Size andReduce Shot Berry of ‘Vanessa’ Grapevines

Thomas J. Zabadal; Thomas W. Dittmer Journal of American Pomological Society 2000. doi:10.71318/apom.2000.54.3.130

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-259f8abfbbdf79031f684ee929f755f86e032359a691ff08415913d23fe19875 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.