Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Super phosphate seed priming increased nodule dry weight.

A claim from Studying the Effect of Different Fertilizers Types and Methods of Application on Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Some Chickpea Varieties Under Rainfed Conditions · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Super phosphate seed priming increased nodule dry weight.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed priming in super phosphate 2%e0
Outcome
nodule dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming in super phosphate 2% as it significantly enhanced the nodule dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–820
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126

Title

Studying the Effect of Different Fertilizers Types and Methods of Application on Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Some Chickpea Varieties Under Rainfed Conditions

Fathi. A. Omer; Dilsher. Sh. Tahir; P. How IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/761/1/012067

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-28ebabcb8fdb6929d4d670e2a50c4ed22770da24a5336ec856b3d4d783a1fb67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

seed treatment · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.