Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dipping fruit alone in terbacil did not cause abscission.

A claim from Thinning of Spur `Delicious' Apples by Shade, Terbacil, Carbaryl, and Ethephon · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping fruit alone in terbacil did not cause abscission.

Treatment
Dipping fruit alone in a terbacil solutione0
Outcome
abscissione0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping fruit alone in a terbacil solution did not cause abscission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–403
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35

Title

Thinning of Spur `Delicious' Apples by Shade, Terbacil, Carbaryl, and Ethephon

R.E. Byers; J.A. Barden; D.H. Carbaugh Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1990. doi:10.21273/jashs.115.1.9

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2d6ea77002941d2a54e2c7b1a7d06072babccea9f244108603dc769830cb2c0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Terbacil · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
See all 7 papers →

application · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 107 positive, 34 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

132 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.