Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T8 significantly increased B:C ratio relative to other treatments.

A claim from Efficacy of neem and zinc coated urea on productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 significantly increased B:C ratio relative to other treatments.

Treatment
100% of Rec. N through ZnCU + Rec. P, K, & Zne0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, nutrient uptake (N, K and Zn), net returns, and B:C ratio were also observed to be significantly higher with the application of 100% of Rec. N through ZnCU + Rec. P, K, & Zn than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1573
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96

Title

Efficacy of neem and zinc coated urea on productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Meenakshi Gupta; Meenakshi Attri; B. C. Sharma; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2022. doi:10.1080/01904167.2022.2087086

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2e9dcf72a769c5224515f6a9919685e8134144d1bf469b0117b802bd7e785637 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

563 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.