Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Using a disc for basic tillage reduced corn seed yield.

A claim from The Influence of the Tillage System, Hybrid and Climatic Conditions on Corn Yields in the Osmancea Area, ConstanÈ›a · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using a disc for basic tillage reduced corn seed yield.

Treatment
Using the disc for basic tillagee3
Outcome
seed yielde3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In order to achieve profitable corn crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41
e3

“Using the disc for basic tillage had negative effects on the percentage of plants that emerged, but also reduced seed yield, while weed infestation was higher compared to the other types of tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1586

Title

The Influence of the Tillage System, Hybrid and Climatic Conditions on Corn Yields in the Osmancea Area, Constanța

Celzin Aedin; Cristina Melucă; Mădălina-Elena Ristea; et al. Romanian Agricultural Research 2024. doi:10.59665/rar4120

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2edf8de7892d928e9173393b676e69c71fc08d5db5090f13e5c43e7f9da33dc3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.