Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Residual copper from a 1967 fertilizer treatment had no detected effect on severity.

A claim from Effect of nitrogen and residual copper on the occurrence of Rhizoctonia bare patch in wheat grown near Esperance, Western Australia · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual copper from a 1967 fertilizer treatment had no detected effect on severity.

Treatment
Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967e0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967 had no effect on the area of rhizoctonia bare patch or the incidence and severity of root rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–344
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91

Title

Effect of nitrogen and residual copper on the occurrence of Rhizoctonia bare patch in wheat grown near Esperance, Western Australia

RF Brennan Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1991. doi:10.1071/ea9910259

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-30cee350ecbd6ac9e25ddbde06874fe2e609f65aace67a19ebeb2197954d5ed5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

copper atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Severe copper deficiency caused wilting.

    Anomalous Water Relations in Copper-Deficient Wheat Plants · 1976

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.