Abstract
The area of rhizoctonia bare patch and the incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot (caused by Rhizoctonia solani Khnn) were reduced by the application of ammonium nitrate fertiliser. Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967 had no effect on the area of rhizoctonia bare patch or the incidence and severity of root rot. With no applied nitrogen (N), 17.6% (mean of residual Cu levels) of the plot was affected by patches while the area of plot affected by patches declined to 4.2% where 92 kg N/ha had been applied. The incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot declined from 45.9 and 27.0% to 32.7 and 9.1%, respectively, with the application of N fertiliser. The grain yield of wheat supplied with adequate Cu increased although the level of N fertiliser exceeded that considered adequate for plant nutrition. The response is explained by the control of rhizoctonia bare patch. The area of rhizoctonia patches and the incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot decreased with the application of N, and with adequate Cu fertiliser (2.2 kg Cu/ha), the grain yields increased. However, with marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertiliser, the application of N fertiliser induced Cu deficiency in wheat plants, and the grain yields declined although rhizoctonia patches were reduced.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium nitrate fertiliser reduced area of rhizoctonia bare patch in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- application of ammonium nitrate fertilisere0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani Khnn
Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- area of rhizoctonia bare patche0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The area of rhizoctonia bare patch and the incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot (caused by Rhizoctonia solani Khnn) were reduced by the application of ammonium nitrate fertiliser.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium nitrate fertiliser reduced incidence in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of ammonium nitrate fertilisere0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani KhnnRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The area of rhizoctonia bare patch and the incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot (caused by Rhizoctonia solani Khnn) were reduced by the application of ammonium nitrate fertiliser.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium nitrate fertiliser reduced severity in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of ammonium nitrate fertilisere0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani KhnnRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- severitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The area of rhizoctonia bare patch and the incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot (caused by Rhizoctonia solani Khnn) were reduced by the application of ammonium nitrate fertiliser.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual copper from a 1967 fertilizer treatment had no detected effect on area of rhizoctonia bare patch.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967e0
- Outcome
- area of rhizoctonia bare patche0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967 had no effect on the area of rhizoctonia bare patch or the incidence and severity of root rot.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual copper from a 1967 fertilizer treatment had no detected effect on incidence.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967e0
- Outcome
- incidencee0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967 had no effect on the area of rhizoctonia bare patch or the incidence and severity of root rot.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual copper from a 1967 fertilizer treatment had no detected effect on severity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967e0
- Outcome
- severitye0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Residual copper (Cu) from a Cu fertiliser treatment in 1967 had no effect on the area of rhizoctonia bare patch or the incidence and severity of root rot.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Patch area declined from 17.6% without N to 4.2% with 92 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 92 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- area of plot affected by patchese0
- Direction
- declinede0
- Value
- 4.2%e0
- Qualifier
- 17.6%e0
- Comparator
- no applied nitrogen (N)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With no applied nitrogen (N), 17.6% (mean of residual Cu levels) of the plot was affected by patches while the area of plot affected by patches declined to 4.2% where 92 kg N/ha had been applied.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
incidence declined to 32.7 with N fertiliser.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of N fertilisere0
- Outcome
- incidencee0
- Direction
- declinede0
- Value
- 32.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot declined from 45.9 and 27.0% to 32.7 and 9.1%, respectively, with the application of N fertiliser.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
severity of rhizoctonia root rot declined to 9.1% with N fertiliser.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of N fertilisere0
- Outcome
- severity of rhizoctonia root rote0
- Direction
- declinede0
- Value
- 9.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The incidence and severity of rhizoctonia root rot declined from 45.9 and 27.0% to 32.7 and 9.1%, respectively, with the application of N fertiliser.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield increased with adequate Cu despite N above the level considered adequate for nutrition.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- adequate Cue0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- level of N fertiliser exceeded that considered adequate for plant nutritione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield of wheat supplied with adequate Cu increased although the level of N fertiliser exceeded that considered adequate for plant nutrition.”
Claim · model-written summary
The yield response was attributed to control of rhizoctonia bare patch.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- responsee0
- Qualifier
- control of rhizoctonia bare patche0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The response is explained by the control of rhizoctonia bare patch.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
With marginal or deficient Cu, N fertiliser induced Cu deficiency in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- application of N fertilisere0
- Outcome
- Cu deficiencye0
- Direction
- inducede0
- Qualifier
- marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertilisere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, with marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertiliser, the application of N fertiliser induced Cu deficiency in wheat plants, and the grain yields declined although rhizoctonia patches were reduced.”
Claim · model-written summary
With marginal or deficient Cu, N fertiliser declined grain yields in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- application of N fertilisere0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- declinede0
- Qualifier
- marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertilisere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, with marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertiliser, the application of N fertiliser induced Cu deficiency in wheat plants, and the grain yields declined although rhizoctonia patches were reduced.”
Claim · model-written summary
With marginal or deficient Cu, N fertiliser reduced rhizoctonia patches in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- application of N fertilisere0
- Outcome
- rhizoctonia patchese0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertilisere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, with marginal and deficient levels of applied Cu fertiliser, the application of N fertiliser induced Cu deficiency in wheat plants, and the grain yields declined although rhizoctonia patches were reduced.”
The same questions in other papers
copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →copper atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 410 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
475 papers more in this group
See all 479 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
955 papers more in this group
See all 959 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.