Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen plus biosuper increased yield by 89/39g/m2.

A claim from The effect of irrigation and nitrogenous and phosphorous biofertilizers on yield and yield component on chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) ILC482 line · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen plus biosuper increased yield by 89/39g/m2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen + biosuper biofertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
89/39g/m2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen + biosuper biofertilizer increased more number of pods with one seed per plant by 19/28, number of pods with two seed by 15/28, seed weight per plant by 4/47 g/m2, pod weight per plant by 5/93 g/m2and yield by 89/39g/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–877
t0

“chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–132

Title

The effect of irrigation and nitrogenous and phosphorous biofertilizers on yield and yield component on chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) ILC482 line

Zahra Rabieyan; F Rahimzadeh Khoei; V Ahmadi 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3d209150ae91adeafdf19e22a4d5171492b7870ee859bae392853b6c36e3fc87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.