Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NAA or Sevin spraying did not affect sucrose translocation in either cultivar.

A claim from Translocation of 14C-Indoleacetic Acid and 14C-Sucrose in Excised Apple Pedicels1 · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA or Sevin spraying did not affect sucrose translocation in either cultivar.

Treatment
spraying the tree with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) or 1-naphthyl methylcarbamate (Sevin)e1
Outcome
translocation of sucrosee1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Translocation of 14C-Indoleacetic Acid and 14C-Sucrose in Excised Apple Pedicels1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81
e1

“In both cultivars translocation of sucrose was not affected by spraying the tree with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) or 1-naphthyl methylcarbamate (Sevin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–388

Title

Translocation of 14C-Indoleacetic Acid and 14C-Sucrose in Excised Apple Pedicels1

G. W. Schneider Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1973. doi:10.21273/jashs.98.3.278

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5b5e3caa8cd436008036b445074decca600919aca1485ca08b3d8b93c92f6b2c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

carbaryl · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.