Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No significant yield difference between conventional and reduced tillage was found for corn, sunflower and winter wheat.

A claim from LONG-TERM TILLAGE EFFECTS ON CROP YIELD IN THE TRANS-TISZA REGION OF HUNGARY · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant yield difference between conventional and reduced tillage was found for corn, sunflower and winter wheat.

Treatment
Conventional Tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
crop yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
Reduced (RT)e0
Setting
TRANS-TISZA REGION OF HUNGARYt0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage techniques Conventional Tillage (CT) and Reduced (RT) on the yield of three crops; Corn, Sunflower and Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–173
e4

“there was no significant difference in crop yield between the two tillage techniques i.e. CT and RT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1139
t0

“TRANS-TISZA REGION OF HUNGARY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–76

Title

LONG-TERM TILLAGE EFFECTS ON CROP YIELD IN THE TRANS-TISZA REGION OF HUNGARY

Abdulwahab Abdulrazaq Bichi; József Zsembeli; Attila Nagy Natural Resources and Sustainable Development 2021. doi:10.31924/nrsd.v11i2.075

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-5ea52e351192c46f92b92b2cc5dc1091f8e2df69910fce34517c37091b6e5440 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 50 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this claim · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.