Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Transpiration rate of durum wheat remained unaffected under the elevated CO2 and temperature interaction.

A claim from Response of aestivum and durum wheat varieties to elevated CO2 and temperature under OTC condition · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate of durum wheat remained unaffected under the elevated CO2 and temperature interaction.

Material
durum varietye0
Treatment
elevated CO2 plus high temperature interaction treatmente0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
remained unaffectede0
Comparator
ambiente0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In aestivum variety of wheat, transpiration rate significantly reduced in elevated CO2 plus high temperature interaction treatment than ambient while transpiration rate of durum variety remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–877

Title

Response of aestivum and durum wheat varieties to elevated CO2 and temperature under OTC condition

SHRAVANI SANYAL; BIDISHA CHAKRABARTI; A. BHATIA; et al. Journal of Agrometeorology 2023. doi:10.54386/jam.v25i4.2366

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-731affa38338e0be3852fe6f8a451aaa0ce0a5227a72a3c95e7899827c039474 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

heat · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 4 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.