Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined herbicide treatment gave the highest grain yield of 47.30 q/ha.

A claim from Effect of various herbicides for weed control in late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined herbicide treatment gave the highest grain yield of 47.30 q/ha.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 1000 ml ha-1 fb Metribuzin 250g ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.30 q/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin 1000 ml ha-1 fb Metribuzin 250g ha-1 was found effective to control weed populations and recorded (47.30 q/ha) the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–827
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–87

Title

Effect of various herbicides for weed control in late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Rajat Sharma; Vikas Tomar; Ishwar Singh; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i6i.941

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-7323d54e892a6e6d6d3a2fd8d42393184a23923e3429e8c47ed99db7c080655a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Clomazone at 430 g ha −1 with pendimethalin and chloramben reduced wheat yield in one of two years.

    Response of Navy Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Grown in Rotation to Clomazone, Imazethapyr, Bentazon, and Acifluorften · 1992 · compared with weed-free control

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Pendimethalin reduced subsequent wheat grain yield at the lentil hilltop site.

    Effects of Imazethapyr and Pendimethalin on Lentil (Lens culinaris), Pea (Pisum sativum), and a Subsequent Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Crop1 · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Pendimethalin plus isoproturon affected Clever grain yield only in the hard-winter season.

    Sensitivity of Winter Wheat Cultivars to Selected Herbicides · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Metribuzin plus pendimethalin reduced grain yield in eight named wheat cultivars in 1978.

    Response of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Herbicides · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Pendimethalin applied PPI in spring at 1X or 2X the recommended rate had no adverse effect on maturity at harvest of winter wheat.

    Pendimethalin Residues from Weed Management in Dry Bean Can Cause Injury in Autumn Seeded Winter Wheat · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Label-rate pendimethalin did not decrease yields of any tested wheat variety relative to control.

    Response of Strip-Planted Wheat Varieties to Pendimethalin · 2019 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Pre-emergence Pendimethalin (Panida) had no significant effect on NO3--N production.

    Effects of herbicides on in-situ net mineralization of nitrogen in wheat field · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Metribuzin phytotoxicity reduced wheat growth, development and yield.

    Effect of different herbicides on growth, yield and economics of crops in wheat-chickpea intercropping system · 2024

    Opposite direction

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Metribuzin plus fenoxaprop-p-ethyl depressed wheat yield and appeared phytotoxic.

    Efficacy of various herbicides against weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2012

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Metribuzin injury significantly reduced wheat yield across application stages.

    Alternatives to Diclofop for the Control of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl + metribuzin gave wheat grain yield at par with the weedy check.

    Bioefficacy of herbicides in relation to sowing methods in wheat · 2012 · compared with weedy check

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Metribuzin plus pendimethalin reduced grain yield in eight named wheat cultivars in 1978.

    Response of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Herbicides · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Yield was not reduced by early spring metribuzin application.

    Effect of Application Timing on Winter Wheat Response to Metribuzin · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Metribuzin reduced grain yields of both varieties by approximately 40%

    Metribuzin and Chlorsulfuron Effect on Grain of Treated Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 1986

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Postemergence chlorsulfuron plus metsulfuron with metribuzin reduced wheat yield in 1993.

    Sulfonylurea Herbicides Suppress Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 1994

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Increasing metribuzin from 100 to 140 g ha−1 in the mixture reduced wheat yield.

    Performance of Tank Mixture of Metribuzin with Clodinafop and Fenoxaprop for the Control of Mixed Weed Flora in Wheat · 2005

    Opposite direction

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.