Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Puddled transplanting increased nitrogen uptake and use efficiency.

A claim from Yield and economics as influenced by nitrogen scheduling, weed management and rice establishment methods in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting increased nitrogen uptake and use efficiency.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
Puddled transplantinge0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiencye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
unpuddled transplantinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Puddled transplanting resulted in significantly more grains/panicle, panicle length, panicles/hill, grain yield (t/ha), nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency, net returns and benefit: cost ratio than unpuddled transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1241
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–140

Title

Yield and economics as influenced by nitrogen scheduling, weed management and rice establishment methods in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa)

RAGHUBAR SAHU; MANOJ KUMAR SINGH; LALJI YADAV Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v60i2.4447

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7e89152cf41f4bbcfca3625797e82eb4fe082b3c2191e5e1c369defdfed5649b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

transplanting · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.