Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Nitrogen management in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa) in mid hill acidic soils of Sikkim Himalayas

RAVIKANT AVASTHE

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at Tadong in Sikkim in the humid mid-hill acidic soils during rainy ( kharif) season of 2004, 2005 and 2006 to optimize the rate, source and schedule of nitrogen management for increasing the yield and nitrogen-use efficiency of transplanted rice ( Or yza sativa L.) under 9 schedules, 4 rates (0, 80, 120 and 160), 3 nitrogen sources (urea, farm yard manure and neem cake-coated urea) in comparison with farmers practices. N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI) recorded the highest yield (5.44 t/ha), recovery efficiency (82%) and agronomic efficiency (47.9 kg grain / kg N applied). The grain yield increased with increase in the N rate from 80 to 160 kg/ha. Conjunc- tive application of FYM and urea increased the N uptake by 11.1 to 26.2%, recovery efficiency (11.1 to 46.7%) and agronomic efficiency (5.4 to 14.8 %). Basal application of FYM @ 2.5 t/ha and top-dressing 80 kg N/ha through urea as N at 10 DAT + N at MT+ at PI stage recorded the highest recovery efficiency (66.3%) and agro- nomic efficiency (38.7 kg grain / kg N applied). At 120 kg N/ha neem cake increased the recovery efficiency by 12.1 and 37.6% and agronomic efficiency by 9.9 and 15.8% over N with and without FYM. Farmers practice of 120 application of FYM basal @ 5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha along with top-dressing of DAP @ 40 kg/ha at PI gave low yield and N-use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified 80 kg/ha nitrogen schedule gave the highest rice yield of 5.44 t/ha.

Treatment
N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.44 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI) recorded the highest yield (5.44 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same schedule gave the highest recovery efficiency of 82%.

Treatment
N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI)e0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI) recorded the highest yield (5.44 t/ha), recovery efficiency (82%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same schedule gave the highest agronomic efficiency of 47.9 kg grain / kg N applied.

Treatment
N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI)e0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.9 kg grain / kg N appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“N application @ 80 kg/ha as N 10 days after transplanting (DAT) + N at maximum tillering (MT) + at panicale initiation (PI) recorded the highest yield (5.44 t/ha), recovery efficiency (82%) and agronomic efficiency (47.9 kg grain / kg N applied)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–706 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield increased as nitrogen rate rose from 80 to 160 kg/ha.

Treatment
N rate from 80 to 160 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain yield increased with increase in the N rate from 80 to 160 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FYM and urea increased nitrogen uptake by 11.1 to 26.2%.

Treatment
Conjunc- tive application of FYM and ureae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.1 to 26.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conjunc- tive application of FYM and urea increased the N uptake by 11.1 to 26.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FYM and urea increased recovery efficiency by 11.1 to 46.7%.

Treatment
Conjunc- tive application of FYM and ureae0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.1 to 46.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conjunc- tive application of FYM and urea increased the N uptake by 11.1 to 26.2%, recovery efficiency (11.1 to 46.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined FYM and urea increased agronomic efficiency by 5.4 to 14.8%.

Treatment
Conjunc- tive application of FYM and ureae0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.4 to 14.8 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Conjunc- tive application of FYM and urea increased the N uptake by 11.1 to 26.2%, recovery efficiency (11.1 to 46.7%) and agronomic efficiency (5.4 to 14.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal FYM and staged urea gave the highest recovery efficiency of 66.3%.

Treatment
Basal application of FYM @ 2.5 t/ha and top-dressing 80 kg N/ha through urea as N at 10 DAT + N at MT+ at PI stagee0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
66.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Basal application of FYM @ 2.5 t/ha and top-dressing 80 kg N/ha through urea as N at 10 DAT + N at MT+ at PI stage recorded the highest recovery efficiency (66.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal FYM and staged urea gave the highest agronomic efficiency of 38.7 kg grain / kg N applied.

Treatment
Basal application of FYM @ 2.5 t/ha and top-dressing 80 kg N/ha through urea as N at 10 DAT + N at MT+ at PI stagee0
Outcome
agro- nomic efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.7 kg grain / kg N appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Basal application of FYM @ 2.5 t/ha and top-dressing 80 kg N/ha through urea as N at 10 DAT + N at MT+ at PI stage recorded the highest recovery efficiency (66.3%) and agro- nomic efficiency (38.7 kg grain / kg N applied)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 120 kg N/ha increased recovery efficiency by 12.1 and 37.6% over nitrogen with and without FYM.

Treatment
120 kg N/ha neem cakee0
Outcome
recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.1 and 37.6%e0
Comparator
N with and without FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 120 kg N/ha neem cake increased the recovery efficiency by 12.1 and 37.6% and agronomic efficiency by 9.9 and 15.8% over N with and without FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 120 kg N/ha increased agronomic efficiency by 9.9 and 15.8% over nitrogen with and without FYM.

Treatment
120 kg N/ha neem cakee0
Outcome
agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.9 and 15.8%e0
Comparator
N with and without FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 120 kg N/ha neem cake increased the recovery efficiency by 12.1 and 37.6% and agronomic efficiency by 9.9 and 15.8% over N with and without FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers practice produced low rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
Farmers practice of 120 application of FYM basal @ 5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha along with top-dressing of DAP @ 40 kg/ha at PIe0
Outcome
low yield and N-use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Farmers practice of 120 application of FYM basal @ 5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha along with top-dressing of DAP @ 40 kg/ha at PI gave low yield and N-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1476 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.