Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium plus P fertiliser increased rhizosphere P by 20-348% compared with the other fertiliser treatments.

A claim from P-fertiliser and rhizobial inoculation increased the concentration of mineral nutrients in the rhizosphere of two chickpea genotypes · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus P fertiliser increased rhizosphere P by 20-348% compared with the other fertiliser treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculation plus P fertilisere0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Pe1
Direction
higher accumulationse0
Value
20-348%e1
Qualifier
rhizospheree0
Comparator
the other fertiliser treatmentse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation plus P fertiliser resulted in higher accumulations of rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–816
e1

“P (20-348%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–840
e2

“compared to the other fertiliser treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–926
e3

“chickpea genotypes (ACC#1 & ACC#5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–529

Title

P-fertiliser and rhizobial inoculation increased the concentration of mineral nutrients in the rhizosphere of two chickpea genotypes

John B.O. Ogola; Vhulenda Madzivhandila; Sipho T. Maseko; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2023. doi:10.1080/09064710.2023.2197457

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8a922772ffcdba0d62ed1754c6bf6f719eca0708894854c3fff26f28129a010f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.