Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tank mixture plus hand weeding gave higher maize growth and yield traits than remaining treatments.

A claim from Influence of integrated weed management on growth and yield of Kharif maize (Zea mays L.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixture plus hand weeding gave higher maize growth and yield traits than remaining treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
tank mixure application of Tembotrinone 42 SC @ 120gm a.i.ha-1 + Atrazine 50 WP @ 500 gm a.i.ha-1 + surfactant @ 2ml/l of water EPoE At 20-25 DAS + fb hand weeding at 40 DASe0
Outcome
growth and yield contributing characterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
remaining weed management treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed free check and tank mixure application of Tembotrinone 42 SC @ 120gm a.i.ha-1 + Atrazine 50 WP @ 500 gm a.i.ha-1 + surfactant @ 2ml/l of water EPoE At 20-25 DAS + fb hand weeding at 40 DAS were on par with each other and recorded significantly the higher growth and yield contributing characters viz., plant height (cm), number of functional leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1(dm2), dry matter plant-1(g), length of cob (cm), diameter of cob(cm), number of grains, weight of grains cob-1and test weight resulting into significant increase in grain and straw yields of maize as compared to remaining weed management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–1272

Title

Influence of integrated weed management on growth and yield of Kharif maize (Zea mays L.)

A. S. Bade; J. B. Patil; R. H. Shinde; et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2021. doi:10.15740/has/ijas/17-aaebssd/292-296

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-92e76fd4ceede2b475a4d10aab46808f59d7b5983a0ca34966896696880132aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

surfactant · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

transgenic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.