Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Improved soil water environment may promote plant nitrogen absorption.

A claim from Study on Relationship of Double Layer's Source-Sink for Rice Super-High Yielding Culture · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved soil water environment may promote plant nitrogen absorption.

Treatment
improvement of soil water environmente0
Outcome
N absorption of plante0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement of soil water environment may promote the development and extending downward of rootsystem, mineralization of soil N, and N absorption of plant simultaneously.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–659
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60

Title

Study on Relationship of Double Layer's Source-Sink for Rice Super-High Yielding Culture

Zhao Qiangj Zhongguo shuidao kexue 1995

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9ebbc6a43005e4051d89fe61b18f99d2c21759efd742cf122a741bb502d4818a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

soil water · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.