Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Improved soil water environment may promote downward root development.

A claim from Study on Relationship of Double Layer's Source-Sink for Rice Super-High Yielding Culture · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved soil water environment may promote downward root development.

Treatment
improvement of soil water environmente0
Outcome
development and extending downward of rootsysteme0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The improvement of soil water environment may promote the development and extending downward of rootsystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–590
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60
t1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60

Title

Study on Relationship of Double Layer's Source-Sink for Rice Super-High Yielding Culture

Zhao Qiangj Zhongguo shuidao kexue 1995

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d43a9e7d41e6cc649e3cf15cbb8bec00d7a33eecfeb485cad287ede28737d0c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

climate site · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

soil water · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 21 positive, 19 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.