Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After three subcultures on sorbitol medium, mature apple cultures showed enhanced shoot proliferation.

A claim from Regulation of in Vitro Shoot and Root Regeneration in ‘Macspur’ Apple by Sorbitol (D-Glucitol) and Related Carbon Sources · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three subcultures on sorbitol medium, mature apple cultures showed enhanced shoot proliferation.

Material
‘Macspur’e0
Treatment
sorbitol mediume1
Outcome
shoot proliferatione1
Direction
enhancee1
Qualifier
subcultured 3 timese1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple scion cultivar ‘Macspur’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–87
e1

“In the mature culture (initially sucrose-grown), enhance shoot proliferation and rooting occurred on sorbitol medium after this source was subcultured 3 times on sorbitol medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1048

Title

Regulation of in Vitro Shoot and Root Regeneration in ‘Macspur’ Apple by Sorbitol (D-Glucitol) and Related Carbon Sources

Eng-Chong Pua; Calvin Chong Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1985. doi:10.21273/jashs.110.5.705

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-a653a67ff295584f794f536067be7cb2a64d8ed2e2d3b7c318ec96f5c0473066 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

glucitol · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.