Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ploughless tillage with lime sludge incorporation gave better field pea germination during droughty post-sowing periods.

A claim from Response of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) growth to reduced tillage of clayey soil. · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughless tillage with lime sludge incorporation gave better field pea germination during droughty post-sowing periods.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
Ploughless tillage in combination with lime sludge incorporatione2
Outcome
germinatione2
Direction
bettere2
Value
18 and 20 dayse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e2

“Ploughless tillage in combination with lime sludge incorporation resulted in a significantly higher soil water content in seedbed layer (0–5 cm) directly after field pea sowing in 2009, better field pea germination within the prolonged droughty post-sowing periods (18 and 20 days respectively in 2008 and 2009) and higher grain yield in 2008 as compared to deep ploughing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–1049
t0

“Response of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47

Title

Response of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) growth to reduced tillage of clayey soil.

Aleksandras Velykis; A. Satkus Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2012

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-ae8a0fd6cf8bb0e6023225ac39828c94b1e5f89192f5809b40526fc6fa4a94e8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

lime · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

organic · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

tillage · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.