Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying the titanium-containing fertilizer on wheat increased grain number per spike by 3.4% compared with self-made fertilizer.

A claim from Effects of Applying Titanium Contained Trace-element Fertilizer to Several Kinds of Grain Crops in Hunan · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying the titanium-containing fertilizer on wheat increased grain number per spike by 3.4% compared with self-made fertilizer.

Treatment
spraying Wanchun titanium contained trace-element fertilizere7
Outcome
grain number per spikee6
Direction
increasee6
Value
3.4%e6
Comparator
self-made trace element fertilizere7
Setting
Hunan provincee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The field experiments that applying Wanchun titanium contained trace-element fertilizer to several kinds of grain crops(rice,barley,wheat,maize and sorghum) were carried out in Hunan province from 2009 to 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209
e7

“In comparison with treatment of self-made trace element fertilizer,spraying Wanchun titanium contained trace-element fertilizer to wheat can increase spike rate in late period by 5.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1251
e6

“increase grain number per spike by 3.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1291

Title

Effects of Applying Titanium Contained Trace-element Fertilizer to Several Kinds of Grain Crops in Hunan

Rui Tang Hunan Agricultural Sciences 2011

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-b33d8dfa2bb2c15c84b41d503fb56d81b111514f22511cebb0904bfef624c2e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.