Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All three treatments of rice straw improved the rumen degradation rates of dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber.

A claim from Effects of Different Treatments on Nutritional Value of Rice Straw · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three treatments of rice straw improved the rumen degradation rates of dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber.

Organ / stage
strawt0
Treatment
urea, complex bacteria and complex enzymese4
Outcome
rumen degradation rates of dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fibere4
Direction
improvement effectse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nutritional Value of Rice Straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66
e4

“Analysis of the rumen degradation rates of dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in rice straw treated with urea, complex bacteria and complex enzymes showed that all treatment had the improvement effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–627

Title

Effects of Different Treatments on Nutritional Value of Rice Straw

Liu Chun Journal of Yellow Cattle Science 2002

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-b7f2bae4bb5bd36badd2b1125b676eb205e4d228f2463672cb27b7df3ab03b1d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.