Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till with and without nitrogen fertilization significantly increased soil water content, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen relative to conventional tillage.

A claim from Tillage Strategy and Nitrogen Fertilization Methods Influences on Selected Soil Quality Indicators and Spring Wheat Yield under Semi-Arid Environmental Conditions of the Loess Plateau, China · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till with and without nitrogen fertilization significantly increased soil water content, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sole no-tillage and NT in association with nitrogen fertilization (inorganic and organic)e0
Outcome
soil water content, SOC, TNe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole CT and CT together with nitrogen fertilization (organic and inorganic)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole no-tillage and NT in association with nitrogen fertilization (inorganic and organic) significantly increased the soil water content, SOC, TN, NH4+-N, C/P, and N/P ratios and wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1259
e1

“compared with sole CT and CT together with nitrogen fertilization (organic and inorganic)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1428
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–115

Title

Tillage Strategy and Nitrogen Fertilization Methods Influences on Selected Soil Quality Indicators and Spring Wheat Yield under Semi-Arid Environmental Conditions of the Loess Plateau, China

Jianyu Yuan; Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; et al. Applied Sciences 2022. doi:10.3390/app12031101

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b8cad1326d378771e95d965f86d0eca4d186cdf8993dda4264af2c3492a4116b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

205 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.