Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Blended fertilizer NPS 1 B 1 Zn 1 increased grain yield by 19% compared with the recommended NP fertilizer.

A claim from Effect of Different Blended Fertilizer Formulation on Yield and Yield Components of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Siyadebrenawayu District, North Shewa, Ethiopia · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizer NPS 1 B 1 Zn 1 increased grain yield by 19% compared with the recommended NP fertilizer.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt1
Treatment
application of blended fertilizer NPS 1 B 1 Zn 1e5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
19%e5
Comparator
recommended NP fertilizere5
Setting
Siyadebrenawayu districte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–118
e1

“Field experiment was conducted during 2017 cropping season in Siyadebrenawayu district , central Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–308
e5

“The application of blended fertilizer NPS 1 B 1 Zn 1 increased the straw and grain yield by 35.45% and 19% respectively as compared to the recommended NP fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1802

Title

Effect of Different Blended Fertilizer Formulation on Yield and Yield Components of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Siyadebrenawayu District, North Shewa, Ethiopia

Abebual Woldetsadik Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthcare 2019. doi:10.7176/jbah/9-15-02

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bf69d45285705bfaf8438bb45ce98985174b1141746f3e0b3092e327a1eae0b1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil Zn application did not significantly affect wheat grain yield.

    Relevance for food sciences of quantitative spatially resolved element profile investigations in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zn-EDTA gave the opposite grain yield result to ZnSO4.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021 · compared with ZnSO4

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined foliar zinc and pesticides had no adverse effect on grain yield or other nutrients.

    Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides · 2019

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    The higher nano iron oxide rate decreased those three traits.

    Effect of foliar application of nano-iron oxidase, iron chelate and iron sulphate rates on yield and quality of wheat. · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Nitrogen fertilizer treatments showed significant annual wheat yield declines of 76 to 114 kg ha−1 yr−1.

    Effects of Inorganic Fertilizer Inputs on Grain Yields and Soil Properties in a Long‐Term Wheat–Corn Cropping System in South China · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 84.7 kg/ha/yr under NP fertilization

    Trends in grain yields and soil organic C in a long‐term fertilization experiment in the China Loess Plateau · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Under 100% NP, wheat grain yield fell 19% in 1994 to 1998 relative to 1973 to 1977.

    EFFECTS OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF FERTILIZER USE ON MAIZE AND WHEAT YIELDS AND QUALITY OF AN ACIDIC SOIL IN THE WESTERN HIMALAYAS · 2003 · compared with 1973 to 1977

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    65 kg ha –1 plus nano urea foliar sprays reduced wheat grain yield by 10.7 %.

    Relative performance of granulated and nano urea on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat–rice sequence · 2024

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nanoselenium and sodium selenite also had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Humic acid chelated selenium is suitable for wheat biofortification · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined NPK and NANO-GRO did not affect grain yield or its components in common wheat or spelt.

    Nutritional and technological characteristics of common and spelt wheats are affected by mineral fertilizer and organic stimulator NANO-GRO · 2016

    Opposite direction

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Genetic gain in winter wheat yield without fertiliser N was 0.021 t ha −1 y −1, smaller than at 215–250 kg/ha N.

    Responses of grain yield, biomass and harvest index and their rates of genetic progress to nitrogen availability in ten winter wheat varieties · 2006 · compared with 215–250 kg/ha N

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    The fertilizing substances did not significantly change plant yields.

    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Compost did not significantly affect wheat grain yield, biomass or harvest index.

    Responses of Wheat Yield, Macro- and Micro-Nutrients, and Heavy Metals in Soil and Wheat following the Application of Manure Compost on the North China Plain · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Wheat yields were similar in fertilized fallow and unfertilized green-manure plots.

    Wheat Yields, Nitrogen Uptake, and Soil Moisture Following Winter Legume Cover Crop vs. Fallow · 1998 · compared with unfertilized plots following a green manure crop

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Incorporation timing of feedlot cattle manure had no impact on soil or crop performance.

    Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east-central Saskatchewan · 2004

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.