Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Flowering foliar sprays gave no significant yield improvement.

A claim from YIELD AND QUALITY OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AS AFFECTED BY FOLIAR APPLICATION OF N AND Zn AT FLOWERING · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering foliar sprays gave no significant yield improvement.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar sprays of urea, Zn or both at floweringe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not result in any significant improvemente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40
e0

“foliar sprays of urea, Zn or both at flowering did not result in any significant improvement in dry matter production, yield components and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2726

Title

YIELD AND QUALITY OF MAIZE (Zea mays L.) AS AFFECTED BY FOLIAR APPLICATION OF N AND Zn AT FLOWERING

Aruna Mullapudi 2004

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cb2e54988b58ef0f2fe88921ced9f8ff78c71867e2ad93b9ad86a76f68bdcc40 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 390 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

stage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 41 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 574 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.