Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The chickpea treatment significantly increased gross returns to 47.16 103 /ha.

A claim from Influence of balanced nutrition on productivity, economics and nutrient uptake of hybrid maize (Zea mays)chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping sequence under irrigated ecosystem · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The chickpea treatment significantly increased gross returns to 47.16 103 /ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
25 kg/ha N, 50 kg/ha P and 15 kg/ha ZnSO 4e1
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.16 103 /hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“signifi- cantly higher gross returns (47.16 103 /ha), net returns (31.49 103 /ha) and benefit: cost ratio (3.40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1217
e1

“succeeding chickpea, application of 25 kg/ha N, 50 kg/ha P and 15 kg/ha ZnSO 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–995

Title

Influence of balanced nutrition on productivity, economics and nutrient uptake of hybrid maize (Zea mays)chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping sequence under irrigated ecosystem

S.M. HIREMATH; R. MOHAN KUMAR; ASHOK KUMAR GADDI Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i3.4388

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-d0cdb69a9deec25d33d7548681b12d9bc240bb12c8e4ecb386c3681813404209 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.