Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mineral nutrition preparations increased shoot productivity by 8.1%.

A claim from Productivity and quality of grapevine yield when using micronutrient fertilizers of new generation in the conditions of Crimea · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral nutrition preparations increased shoot productivity by 8.1%.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
micronutrient fertilizerst0
Outcome
shoot productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot productivity by 8.1% and an increase in the cropping capacity by 1.8 t/ha (10.2%) in comparison with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–813
t0

“Productivity and quality of grapevine yield when using micronutrient fertilizers of new generation in the conditions of Crimea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–126

Title

Productivity and quality of grapevine yield when using micronutrient fertilizers of new generation in the conditions of Crimea

Natalia Aleynikova; Evgenia Galkina; Pavel Didenko; et al. BIO Web of Conferences 2021. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20213904004

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d4e3d563d608ba4e534ea77b7e2c8cc04eee59060f907293c31c9a505732b621 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

micronutrient · yield · VitisResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.