Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The zinc plus RDF treatment gave the highest test weight.

A claim from PERFORMANCE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC APPLICATION IN COMBINATION WITH PRIMARY NUTRIENTS IN MID-HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH INDIA · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The zinc plus RDF treatment gave the highest test weight.

Taxon
WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 20 kg ha -1 ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% RDF + 20 kg ha -1 ZnSO 4 resulted in the highest growth parameters (plant height, number of tillers, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate), yield attributes (number of effective tillers, number of grains per spike, spike length and test weight), and yield (grain yield, straw yield, biological yield and harvest index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–578
t0

“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–43

Title

PERFORMANCE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) AS INFLUENCED BY ZINC APPLICATION IN COMBINATION WITH PRIMARY NUTRIENTS IN MID-HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH INDIA

PLANT ARCHIVES 2025. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2025.v25.supplement-2.042

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-de6a41afdde3205918426c804083b297185a276cde715aee9005dde31f921aa9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    ZnSO4 spraying gave the highest test weight in both genotypes.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021

    Same direction

  2. positive
    test weight was higher with 0.7% zinc sulphate, followed by 0.3% potassium nitrate, than control.

    Effect of foliar application of different nutrients on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under sodic soil · 2021 · compared with control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Yield attributes rose significantly up to the 120 : 60 : 45 : 20 rate.

    Realization of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity, profitability and nutrient balance sheet through improved nutrient management · 2017 · compared with control

    Same direction

  4. positive
    T11 increased the listed spike and grain yield attributes.

    Response of Chemical Fertilizers and INM on Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Properties of Soil · 2022

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Soil RDF plus ZnSO4 at 30 kg ha-1 produced the highest wheat test weight.

    Effect of zinc application on quality of wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2021

    Same direction

  6. positive
    T5 significantly improved wheat test weight.

    Effects of different source zinc and application methods on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under timely sowing crop · 2024

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Combined soil and foliar zinc application with ZSB gave the significantly highest effective tiller number, test weight and grain yield of wheat compared with control.

    Response of Different Source and Method of Zinc Application on Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South- West Rajasthan · 2024 · compared with control

    Same direction

  8. positive
    T9 gave test weight of 43.50 g, 16.59% over control.

    Nitrogen Driven Zinc Biofortification in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Linking Growth, Phenology and Yield Attributes · 2026 · compared with control

    Same direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The lower, later nitrogen application did not affect wheat yield or grain quality.

    Integration of Environmental, Agronomic, and Economic Aspects of Fertilizer Management · 1998

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    High nitrogen reduced test weight, grain weight and diameter.

    White Wheat Grain Quality Changes with Genotype, Nitrogen Fertilization, and Water Stress · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Test weight declined linearly with fertilizer in both varieties.

    Yield and Protein Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer of Two Winter Wheat Varieties Differing in Inherent Protein Content of Their Grain1 · 1973

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Ekoplant did not significantly affect grain quality indicators.

    Evaluation of productivity and quality of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and spelt (Triticum spelta L.) in relation to nutrition conditions · 2013

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Late N fertilization did not further improve baking quality.

    Late nitrogen application increased protein concentration but not baking quality of wheat · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Fertilization did not significantly influence wheat yields or grain quality.

    Microbial indicators are better predictors of wheat yield and quality than N fertilization · 2019

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer had little effect on heading, maturity, test weight and seed weight in winter wheat and rye.

    Nitrogen Fertilization of No‐Till Winter Wheat and Rye. I. Yield and Agronomic Responses · 1989

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Certain combinations of high nitrogen fertilizer application with location, cultivar and growing conditions may cause undesirable deterioration in baking quality.

    EFFECTS OF HIGH RATES OF NITROGEN ON NEEPAWA WHEAT GROWN UNDER IRRIGATION II. MILLING AND BAKING QUALITY · 1977

    Opposite direction

145 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.