Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar zinc plus fulvic acid generally improved zinc bioavailability relative to zinc alone.

A claim from The Effectiveness of Foliar Applications of Zinc and Biostimulants to Increase Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc plus fulvic acid generally improved zinc bioavailability relative to zinc alone.

Treatment
Foliar Zn + FAe0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar Zn alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Zn + FA and Zn + AA generally resulted in higher Zn bioavailability than foliar Zn alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–955
t0

“The Effectiveness of Foliar Applications of Zinc and Biostimulants to Increase Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132

Title

The Effectiveness of Foliar Applications of Zinc and Biostimulants to Increase Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain

Shaoxia Wang; Xiaohong Tian; Qing Liu Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020178

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e010f1da92d9c0473d76e6c05f945398878d91ebf6de1afdc5d0e4d0c016c12f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.